arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2410.12972cs.CL
收藏

KCIF:知识条件指令遵循

KCIF: Knowledge-Conditioned Instruction Following

IBM Research AI(IBM人工智能研究)

Rudra Murthy, Praveen Venkateswaran, Prince Kumar, Danish Contractor

AI总结:

本研究提出KCIF,通过组合简单指令与知识基准,发现LLM在知识条件指令遵循上性能显著下降,凸显联合研究知识推理与指令遵循的重要性。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)评估基准传统上将知识/推理能力的测试与指令遵循能力分开进行。在本研究中,我们探讨了知识与指令遵循之间的相互作用,并观察到LLM在遵循简单的答案修改指令时存在困难,同时也会被那些本应不影响原始知识任务答案的干扰指令所分心。我们利用现有的基于多项选择题答案的知识基准,应用一组简单指令,包括操作文本(例如:改变大小写)、数值量(例如:增加值、改变格式)、对列表进行操作(例如:对答案候选进行排序)以及干扰指令(例如:改变数值答案的大小写)。我们评估了来自不同模型家族、参数规模各异(1B-405B)的模型,并惊讶地发现,所有模型在此类简单任务组合上的性能均显著下降。虽然大型和前沿模型的性能下降幅度为40-50%,但在中小型模型中,下降幅度更为严重(有时超过80%)。我们的结果凸显了传统上将知识/推理与指令遵循分开评估的局限性,并表明对这些能力进行联合研究至关重要。我们发布了我们的基准数据集、评估框架代码和结果,以供未来研究使用。

英文摘要:

LLM evaluation benchmarks have traditionally separated the testing of knowledge/reasoning capabilities from instruction following. In this work, we study the interaction between knowledge and instruction following, and observe that LLMs struggle to follow simple answer modifying instructions, and are also distracted by instructions that should have no bearing on the original knowledge task answer. We leverage existing multiple-choice answer based knowledge benchmarks and apply a set of simple instructions which include manipulating text (eg.: change case), numeric quantities (eg.: increase value, change formatting), operate on lists (eg.: sort answer candidates) and distractor instructions (eg.: change case of numeric answers). We evaluate models at varying parameter sizes (1B-405B) from different model families and find that, surprisingly, all models report a significant drop in performance on such simple task compositions. While large-sized and frontier models report performance drops of 40-50%, in small and medium sized models the drop is severe (sometimes exceeding 80%). Our results highlight a limitation in the traditional separation of knowledge/reasoning and instruction following, and suggest that joint-study of these capabilities are important. We release our benchmark dataset, evaluation framework code, and results for future work.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑