arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2410.10550cs.HC
收藏

用户对机器人教练助手披露行为适当性的感知

Users' Perception on Appropriateness of Robotic Coaching Assistant's Disclosure Behaviors

Atikkhan Faridkhan Nilgar, Manuel Dietrich, Kristof Van Laerhoven

AI总结:

本研究针对社交机器人作为教练助手披露用户信息引发的隐私与适当性问题,通过22名参与者的线上预录场景实验,量化用户对不同披露类型及机器人角色的隐私感知,为长期人机协同健康指导的设计提供参考。

摘要:

社交机器人已成为个体健康指导领域的重要助力。值得注意的是,将其融入长期人类指导试验的前景尤为可观,其定位是与人类教练形成互补而非完全替代。在此场景下,机器人在指导过程中作为支持性主体,基于自身掌握的用户健康与活动相关知识提供见解。传统上,这类见解通过书面自我报告或可穿戴数据可视化等方法收集。然而,机器人披露用户信息的行为引发了隐私、适当性与信任层面的担忧。为探究这一问题,我们开展了一项有22名参与者的初步研究,量化用户对机器人教练助手的信息披露行为的隐私感知。该研究在线上开展,向参与者展示了6段预录场景,呈现不同类型的信息披露方式与机器人角色,覆盖从主动响应需求到主动发起沟通的多种条件。

英文摘要:

Social robots have emerged as valuable contributors to individuals' well-being coaching. Notably, their integration into long-term human coaching trials shows particular promise, emphasizing a complementary role alongside human coaches rather than outright replacement. In this context, robots serve as supportive entities during coaching sessions, offering insights based on their knowledge about users' well-being and activity. Traditionally, such insights have been gathered through methods like written self-reports or wearable data visualizations. However, the disclosure of people's information by a robot raises concerns regarding privacy, appropriateness, and trust. To address this, we conducted an initial study with [n = 22] participants to quantify their perceptions of privacy regarding disclosures made by a robot coaching assistant. The study was conducted online, presenting participants with six prerecorded scenarios illustrating various types of information disclosure and the robot's role, ranging from active on-demand to proactive communication conditions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑