arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.19148cs.CL

揭示俄语与英语维基百科中说服性语言的差异

Uncovering Differences in Persuasive Language in Russian versus English Wikipedia

University of Pennsylvania(宾夕法尼亚大学);Air Force Research Lab(空军研究实验室)

Bryan Li, Aleksey Panasyuk, Chris Callison-Burch

AI总结:

本文提出用LLM自动生成并筛选高层次问题来识别多语言文本中的说服性语言,在88K篇英俄维基百科文章上揭示了两文化在乌克兰、中东等主题上的说服性差异,并发布了代码与数据。

摘要:

我们研究用英语和俄语撰写的维基百科文章中说服性语言的差异如何揭示每种文化对不同主题的独特视角。我们开发了一个由大语言模型(LLM)驱动的系统,用于识别多语言文本中的说服性语言实例。我们没有直接提示LLM检测说服性语言——这一任务具有主观性且难度较大——而是提出将该任务重构为提出高层次问题(HLQs),以捕捉不同的说服性方面。重要的是,这些HLQs由LLM自身生成。LLM会过度生成大量HLQs,随后将其过滤为与原始任务的人工标签一致的小集合。然后,我们将该方法应用于一个大规模的双语维基百科文章数据集(共88K篇),采用两阶段的“先识别后提取”提示策略来寻找说服性语言实例。我们量化每篇文章中的说服性语言数量,并通过对配对文章的多项实验探索说服性语言的差异。值得注意的是,我们生成了两种语言中按说服性语言程度排序的文章排名。这些排名与我们对文化显著性主题的直觉一致;俄语维基百科突出与乌克兰相关的主题,而英语维基百科突出中东地区。将主题归入更大的话题类别后,我们发现政治相关事件比其他事件包含更多的说服性语言。我们进一步证明,HLQs在用英语或俄语提出时能获得相似的性能。我们的方法使得跨语言、跨文化的大规模理解成为可能,并且我们发布了代码、提示和数据。

英文摘要:

We study how differences in persuasive language across Wikipedia articles, written in either English and Russian, can uncover each culture's distinct perspective on different subjects. We develop a large language model (LLM) powered system to identify instances of persuasive language in multilingual texts. Instead of directly prompting LLMs to detect persuasion, which is subjective and difficult, we propose to reframe the task to instead ask high-level questions (HLQs) which capture different persuasive aspects. Importantly, these HLQs are authored by LLMs themselves. LLMs over-generate a large set of HLQs, which are subsequently filtered to a small set aligned with human labels for the original task. We then apply our approach to a large-scale, bilingual dataset of Wikipedia articles (88K total), using a two-stage identify-then-extract prompting strategy to find instances of persuasion. We quantify the amount of persuasion per article, and explore the differences in persuasion through several experiments on the paired articles. Notably, we generate rankings of articles by persuasion in both languages. These rankings match our intuitions on the culturally-salient subjects; Russian Wikipedia highlights subjects on Ukraine, while English Wikipedia highlights the Middle East. Grouping subjects into larger topics, we find politically-related events contain more persuasion than others. We further demonstrate that HLQs obtain similar performance when posed in either English or Russian. Our methodology enables cross-lingual, cross-cultural understanding at scale, and we release our code, prompts, and data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑