arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.15045cs.CV
收藏

AIM 2024 稀疏神经渲染挑战赛:方法与结果

AIM 2024 Sparse Neural Rendering Challenge: Methods and Results

University of Würzburg(维尔茨堡大学)
Michal Nazarczuk, Sibi Catley-Chandar, Thomas Tanay, Richard Shaw, Eduardo Pérez-Pellitero, Radu Timofte, Xing Yan, Pan Wang, Yali Guo, Yongxin Wu, Youcheng Cai… 展开作者

Michal Nazarczuk, Sibi Catley-Chandar, Thomas Tanay, Richard Shaw, Eduardo Pérez-Pellitero, Radu Timofte, Xing Yan, Pan Wang, Yali Guo, Yongxin Wu, Youcheng Cai, Yanan Yang, Junting Li, Yanghong Zhou, P. Y. Mok, Zongqi He, Zhe Xiao, Kin-Chung Chan, Hana Lebeta Goshu, Cuixin Yang, Rongkang Dong, Jun Xiao, Kin-Man Lam, Jiayao Hao, Qiong Gao, Yanyan Zu, Junpei Zhang, Licheng Jiao, Xu Liu, Kuldeep Purohit

AI总结:

本文回顾了ECCV 2024的AIM稀疏神经渲染挑战赛,介绍了包含两个不同稀疏度赛道的竞赛设置、使用SpaRe和DTU MVS数据集的评估标准,以及各团队提交的推动该领域前沿的多样化模型及其结果。

摘要:

本文回顾了作为 ECCV 2024 附属的 Advances in Image Manipulation (AIM) 研讨会一部分的稀疏神经渲染挑战赛。本手稿重点关注竞赛设置、提出的方法及其各自的结果。该挑战赛旨在从稀疏图像观测中生成多样化场景的新颖相机视图合成。它由两个赛道组成,具有不同程度的稀疏性;Track 1 为 3 个视图(非常稀疏),Track 2 为 9 个视图(稀疏)。参赛者被要求优化与真实图像的客观保真度,该保真度通过峰值信噪比 (PSNR) 指标进行测量。对于这两个赛道,我们使用了新引入的 Sparse Rendering (SpaRe) 数据集和流行的 DTU MVS 数据集。在本次挑战赛中,有 5 个团队向 Track 1 提交了最终结果,4 个团队向 Track 2 提交了最终结果。提交的模型多种多样,并推动了稀疏神经渲染领域当前最先进技术的边界。本文提供了在挑战赛中开发的所有模型的详细描述。

英文摘要:

This paper reviews the challenge on Sparse Neural Rendering that was part of the Advances in Image Manipulation (AIM) workshop, held in conjunction with ECCV 2024. This manuscript focuses on the competition set-up, the proposed methods and their respective results. The challenge aims at producing novel camera view synthesis of diverse scenes from sparse image observations. It is composed of two tracks, with differing levels of sparsity; 3 views in Track 1 (very sparse) and 9 views in Track 2 (sparse). Participants are asked to optimise objective fidelity to the ground-truth images as measured via the Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) metric. For both tracks, we use the newly introduced Sparse Rendering (SpaRe) dataset and the popular DTU MVS dataset. In this challenge, 5 teams submitted final results to Track 1 and 4 teams submitted final results to Track 2. The submitted models are varied and push the boundaries of the current state-of-the-art in sparse neural rendering. A detailed description of all models developed in the challenge is provided in this paper.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑