arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.09652cs.CL
收藏

揭示大语言模型中的性别偏见:以高等教育中的教师评价为例

Unveiling Gender Bias in Large Language Models: Using Teacher's Evaluation in Higher Education As an Example

Yuanning Huang

AI总结:

本研究以GPT-4生成的六学科高等教育教师评价为对象,通过多维度分析框架揭示LLM文本中存在符合社会刻板印象的性别语言关联模式,验证了其生成内容会反映现有社会偏见。

摘要:

本文研究了高等教育场景下大语言模型(Large Language Model,LLM)生成的教师评价中的性别偏见,重点关注GPT-4在六个学科中生成的评价内容。通过采用包含比值比(Odds Ratio,OR)分析、词嵌入关联测试(Word Embedding Association Test,WEAT)、情感分析和语境分析的综合分析框架,本文识别出反映社会刻板印象的性别关联语言模式。具体而言,与亲和力和支持相关的词汇更频繁地用于描述女性教师,而与趣味性相关的词汇则主要用于描述男性教师,这与社群性和能动性行为的概念相一致。本研究还发现,男性特征形容词与男性名字之间存在中等至强的关联,尽管职业与家庭相关词汇并未清晰体现出性别偏见。这些发现与此前关于社会规范和刻板印象的研究一致,进一步证实了LLM生成的文本会反映现有偏见的观点。

英文摘要:

This paper investigates gender bias in Large Language Model (LLM)-generated teacher evaluations in higher education setting, focusing on evaluations produced by GPT-4 across six academic subjects. By applying a comprehensive analytical framework that includes Odds Ratio (OR) analysis, Word Embedding Association Test (WEAT), sentiment analysis, and contextual analysis, this paper identified patterns of gender-associated language reflecting societal stereotypes. Specifically, words related to approachability and support were used more frequently for female instructors, while words related to entertainment were predominantly used for male instructors, aligning with the concepts of communal and agentic behaviors. The study also found moderate to strong associations between male salient adjectives and male names, though career and family words did not distinctly capture gender biases. These findings align with prior research on societal norms and stereotypes, reinforcing the notion that LLM-generated text reflects existing biases.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑