arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2001.11552physics.soc-phcs.CLcs.CYcs.SIstat.APstat.ML

Unwanted Advances in Higher Education: Uncovering Sexual Harassment Experiences in Academia with Text Mining

College of Information and Communications(信息与传播学院);University of South Carolina(南卡罗来纳大学);University of Arkansas(阿肯色大学)

Amir Karami, Cynthia Nicole White, Kayla Ford, Suzanne Swan, Melek Yildiz Spinel

英文摘要:

Sexual harassment in academia is often a hidden problem because victims are usually reluctant to report their experiences. Recently, a web survey was developed to provide an opportunity to share thousands of sexual harassment experiences in academia. Using an efficient approach, this study collected and investigated more than 2,000 sexual harassment experiences to better understand these unwanted advances in higher education. This paper utilized text mining to disclose hidden topics and explore their weight across three variables: harasser gender, institution type, and victim's field of study. We mapped the topics on five themes drawn from the sexual harassment literature and found that more than 50% of the topics were assigned to the unwanted sexual attention theme. Fourteen percent of the topics were in the gender harassment theme, in which insulting, sexist, or degrading comments or behavior was directed towards women. Five percent of the topics involved sexual coercion (a benefit is offered in exchange for sexual favors), 5% involved sex discrimination, and 7% of the topics discussed retaliation against the victim for reporting the harassment, or for simply not complying with the harasser. Findings highlight the power differential between faculty and students, and the toll on students when professors abuse their power. While some topics did differ based on type of institution, there were no differences between the topics based on gender of harasser or field of study. This research can be beneficial to researchers in further investigation of this paper's dataset, and to policymakers in improving existing policies to create a safe and supportive environment in academia.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑