arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2409.05225cs.CV

两种增强方法在提高关节积血检测准确性中的比较

Comparison of Two Augmentation Methods in Improving Detection Accuracy of Hemarthrosis

University of Toronto(多伦多大学)

Qianyu Fan

AI总结:

本研究比较数据合成与传统增强两种方法对关节积血超声图像检测准确性的提升效果,发现两者均有效且传统增强更优,并通过Grad-CAM解释准确性下降源于域偏移。

摘要:

随着计算能力的提升,医学影像中的机器学习模型已被引入以辅助医学诊断和检查,例如血友病——一种血液无法正常凝结的罕见疾病。通常,检测血友病的瓶颈之一是缺乏可用于训练算法以提高准确性的数据。作为一种可能的解决方案,本研究探讨了通过数据合成或传统增强技术引入增强数据是否能提高模型准确性,从而帮助诊断该疾病。为开展本研究,使用预训练的VGG-16提取超声图像特征,并基于提取的特征在不同分布(真实图像、合成图像和增强图像)之间通过余弦相似度度量比较相似性(真实与真实、合成与合成、真实与不同批次的合成、真实与增强技术)。使用EfficientNet-B4识别“血液”图像并测试两种增强方法下的模型性能。此外,使用梯度加权类激活映射(Grad-CAM)可视化来解释诸如准确性下降等意外结果。合成图像与真实图像未显示出高相似性,平均相似度得分为0.4737。合成批次1数据集和水平翻转图像与原始图像更为相似。经典增强技术和数据合成均可提高模型准确性,且传统增强技术生成的数据性能优于合成数据。此外,Grad-CAM热图显示准确性下降是由于域偏移所致。总体而言,本研究发现数据合成和传统增强技术这两种增强方法均能在一定程度上提高准确性,有助于诊断罕见疾病。

英文摘要:

With the increase of computing power, machine learning models in medical imaging have been introduced to help in rending medical diagnosis and inspection, like hemophilia, a rare disorder in which blood cannot clot normally. Often, one of the bottlenecks of detecting hemophilia is the lack of data available to train the algorithm to increase the accuracy. As a possible solution, this research investigated whether introducing augmented data by data synthesis or traditional augmentation techniques can improve model accuracy, helping to diagnose the diseases. To tackle this research, features of ultrasound images were extracted by the pre-trained VGG-16, and similarities were compared by cosine similarity measure based on extracted features in different distributions among real images, synthetic images, and augmentation images (Real vs. Real, Syn vs. Syn, Real vs. Different Batches of Syn, Real vs. Augmentation Techniques). Model testing performance was investigated using EffientNet-B4 to recognize "blood" images with two augmentation methods. In addition, a gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) visualization was used to interpret the unexpected results like loss of accuracy. Synthetic and real images do not show high similarity, with a mean similarity score of 0.4737. Synthetic batch 1 dataset and images by horizontal flip are more similar to the original images. Classic augmentation techniques and data synthesis can improve model accuracy, and data by traditional augmentation techniques have a better performance than synthetic data. In addition, the Grad-CAM heatmap figured out the loss of accuracy is due to a shift in the domain. Overall, this research found that two augmentation methods, data synthesis and traditional augmentation techniques, both can improve accuracy to a certain extent to help to diagnose rare diseases.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑