arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2409.01301astro-ph.CO
收藏

基于HSC第一年弱引力透镜的高阶统计量与模拟推断相结合的宇宙学研究

Cosmology from HSC Y1 Weak Lensing with Combined Higher-Order Statistics and Simulation-based Inference

Camila P. Novaes, Leander Thiele, Joaquin Armijo, Sihao Cheng, Jessica A. Cowell, Gabriela A. Marques, Elisa G. M. Ferreira, Masato Shirasaki, Ken Osato, Jia Liu

AI总结:

本文利用HSC第一年弱引力透镜数据,结合高阶非高斯统计量与基于模拟的推断方法,在无需假设似然函数形式的情况下将S8约束收紧约25%,其中闵可夫斯基泛函是主要改进来源。

摘要:

我们利用昴星团望远镜Hyper Suprime-Cam(HSC)第一年(Y1)数据,采用基于模拟的推断(SBI)方法,给出了弱引力透镜的宇宙学约束。我们探索了一组高阶统计量(HOS)的性能,包括闵可夫斯基泛函、峰和谷的计数以及概率分布函数,并将其与传统的两点统计量进行比较。高阶统计量也称为非高斯统计量,能够提取两点统计量无法获取的额外非高斯信息。我们使用神经网络压缩汇总统计量,随后采用SBI方法推断宇宙学参数的后验分布。我们对角尺度与红移区间施加截断,以减轻系统效应的影响。结合两点统计量和非高斯统计量,我们得到 $S_8 \equiv σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_m/0.3} = 0.804_{-0.040}^{+0.041}$ 和 $Ω_m = 0.344_{-0.090}^{+0.083}$,与仅使用非高斯统计量的结果相近。这些结果与先前的HSC分析以及Planck 2018宇宙学一致。我们利用非高斯统计量得到的 $S_8$ 约束比两点统计量紧约 $\sim 25\\%$,主要改进体现在 $Ω_m$ 上,与仅使用角功率谱相比误差棒收紧约 $\sim 40\\%$(仅使用角功率谱时 $S_8 = 0.766_{-0.056}^{+0.054}$,$Ω_m = 0.365_{-0.141}^{+0.148}$)。我们发现,在我们研究的非高斯统计量中,闵可夫斯基泛函是这一改进的主要驱动力。我们的分析证实SBI是一种强大的宇宙学约束方法,避免了对数据似然函数形式作任何假设。

英文摘要:

We present cosmological constraints from weak lensing with the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) first-year (Y1) data, using a simulation-based inference (SBI) method. % We explore the performance of a set of higher-order statistics (HOS) including the Minkowski functionals, counts of peaks and minima, and the probability distribution function and compare them to the traditional two-point statistics. The HOS, also known as non-Gaussian statistics, can extract additional non-Gaussian information that is inaccessible to the two-point statistics. We use a neural network to compress the summary statistics, followed by an SBI approach to infer the posterior distribution of the cosmological parameters. We apply cuts on angular scales and redshift bins to mitigate the impact of systematic effects. Combining two-point and non-Gaussian statistics, we obtain $S_8 \equiv σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_m/0.3} = 0.804_{-0.040}^{+0.041}$ and $Ω_m = 0.344_{-0.090}^{+0.083}$, similar to that from non-Gaussian statistics alone. These results are consistent with previous HSC analyses and Planck 2018 cosmology. Our constraints from non-Gaussian statistics are $\sim 25\%$ tighter in $S_8$ than two-point statistics, where the main improvement lies in $Ω_m$, with $\sim 40$\% tighter error bar compared to using the angular power spectrum alone ($S_8 = 0.766_{-0.056}^{+0.054}$ and $Ω_m = 0.365_{-0.141}^{+0.148}$). We find that, among the non-Gaussian statistics we studied, the Minkowski functionals are the primary driver for this improvement. Our analyses confirm the SBI as a powerful approach for cosmological constraints, avoiding any assumptions about the functional form of the data's likelihood.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑