arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2408.13704cs.CLcs.AI

DHP基准:LLM是好的NLG评估器吗?

DHP Benchmark: Are LLMs Good NLG Evaluators?

Texas A&M University(德克萨斯农工大学);Rice University(莱斯大学);Axon Enterprise, Inc.(Axon企业公司)

Yicheng Wang, Jiayi Yuan, Yu-Neng Chuang, Zhuoer Wang, Yingchi Liu, Mark Cusick, Param Kulkarni, Zhengping Ji, Yasser Ibrahim, Xia Hu

AI总结:

针对LLM作为NLG评估器能力未充分探索的问题,提出DHP基准框架,通过层次扰动和统计检验量化评估能力,覆盖四类任务,对五大LLM家族进行基准测试,揭示其优劣。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)正越来越多地作为自然语言生成(NLG)任务中的评估器,这通常被称为“LLM作为裁判”范式。然而,LLM在评估NLG质量方面的能力仍未得到充分探索。当前的研究依赖于人类评估和简单指标,这些方法无法捕捉LLM在不同NLG任务中的辨别力。为弥补这一空白,我们提出了层次扰动辨别力(DHP)基准框架,该框架为LLM提供定量的辨别力评分。该框架利用层次扰动文本数据和统计检验,系统性地衡量LLM的NLG评估能力。我们为此基准重新建立了六个评估数据集,涵盖四项NLG任务:摘要、故事补全、问答和翻译。我们对五个主要LLM家族的全面基准测试,提供了关于它们作为NLG评估器的优势与局限的关键见解。我们的数据集可在https://huggingface.co/datasets/YCWANGVINCE/DHP_Benchmark获取。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as evaluators in Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks; this is often referred to as ``LLM-as-a-judge'' paradigm. However, the capabilities of LLMs in evaluating NLG quality remain underexplored. Current studies depend on human assessments and simple metrics that fail to capture the discernment of LLMs across diverse NLG tasks. To address this gap, we propose the Discernment of Hierarchical Perturbation (DHP) benchmarking framework, which provides quantitative discernment scores for LLMs. This framework leverages hierarchically perturbed text data and statistical tests to systematically measure the NLG evaluation capabilities of LLMs. We re-established six evaluation datasets for this benchmark, covering four NLG tasks: Summarization, Story Completion, Question Answering, and Translation. Our comprehensive benchmarking of five major LLM families provides critical insight into their strengths and limitations as NLG evaluators. Our dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/YCWANGVINCE/DHP_Benchmark.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑