arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.10076math.MGcs.NAmath.COmath.NA
收藏

平面单位距离回避集合密度的无新下界

No new lower bound for the density of planar Sets avoiding Unit Distances

Helmut Ruhland

AI总结:

本文修正了先前声称构造出高于Croft下界的平面单位距离回避集合的错误,指出修正后所有常直径集合均未产生新下界,但保留文章以供参考。

摘要:

在G. Ambrus等人最近发表的一篇文章中,给出了一个回避单位距离的周期集合密度的新上界为$0.2470$,这是第一个小于$1/4$的上界。Croft在1967年的一个构造给出了密度的下界$δ_C = 0.22936$。迄今为止,尚未出现具有更高下界的更好构造。在我这篇文章的早期版本中,我给出了一个平面集合的构造,其密度“高于”Croft的乌龟构造。当时没有给出该密度的显式值,仅证明了Croft密度在所构造的单参数平面集合族中是密度的局部极小值。但现在我发现了一个严重错误。经过本文修正后,所考察的常直径集合均未产生新的下界。我没有撤回这篇文章,也许其中某些内容对某人会有所用处。

英文摘要:

In a recently published article by G. Ambrus et al. a new \emph{upper bound} for the density of an unit avoiding, periodic set is given as $0.2470$, the first upper bound $< 1/4$. A construction of Croft 1967 gave a \emph{lower bound} $δ_C = 0.22936$ for the density. To this date, no better construction with a higher bound has been given. In the \emph{first versions} of this article I gave a construction of planar sets with a "higher" density than Croft's tortoises. No explicit value for this density was given, it was just shown that Croft's density is a local minima in the density of the constructed 1-parameter family of planar sets. But now I found a servere error. After the correction in this article none of the investigated sets of constant diameter resulted in a new lower bound. I did not withdraw the article, maybe something could be useful for somebody.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑