arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2408.07532eess.IVcs.CV

基于稀疏CMR切片的改进型三维全心脏几何结构重建

Improved 3D Whole Heart Geometry from Sparse CMR Slices

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London(伦敦国王学院生物医学工程与影像科学学院);College of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University(浙江师范大学数学医学院);Imperial College London(伦敦帝国学院);HeartFlow, Inc.(HeartFlow公司);University/BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh(爱丁堡大学大学/英国心脏基金会心血管科学中心)

Yiyang Xu, Hao Xu, Matthew Sinclair, Esther Puyol-Antón, Steven A Niederer, Amedeo Chiribiri, Steven E Williams, Michelle C Williams, Alistair A Young

AI总结:

本研究针对CMR稀疏切片存在呼吸运动伪影的问题,结合SSA、STN与LTN实现运动校正和稀疏到密集分割转换,在199例测试中取得优异性能且可校正拓扑错误,相关代码已开源。

摘要:

心脏磁共振成像(CMR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)是评估心血管疾病患者的两种常见无创成像方法。CMR通常采集多张稀疏二维切片,切片间不可避免存在呼吸运动伪影,而CT可采集各向同性的密集数据但会使用电离辐射。本研究探索将Slice Shifting Algorithm(SSA,切片偏移算法)、Spatial Transformer Network(STN,空间变换网络)与Label Transformer Network(LTN,标签变换网络)相结合,以实现两个目标:1)校正已分割切片间的呼吸运动;2)将稀疏分割数据转换为密集分割数据。研究使用由1699例CT数据生成的合成运动伪影CMR切片分割结果验证了所有组合方案,其中密集CT数据作为真值参考。在199例测试病例中,SSA-LTN在Dice系数和豪斯多夫距离指标上取得了最优结果(5个标签的平均值分别为94.0%和4.7mm),但有8例出现拓扑错误。STN作为插件工具可有效校正所有拓扑错误,且对整体性能影响极小(两项指标分别为93.5%和5.0mm)。SSA也被证明是极具价值的插件工具,可同时提升基于STN和基于LTN的模型性能。不同组合方案的代码可在https://github.com/XESchong/STACOM2024获取。

英文摘要:

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) are two common non-invasive imaging methods for assessing patients with cardiovascular disease. CMR typically acquires multiple sparse 2D slices, with unavoidable respiratory motion artefacts between slices, whereas CT acquires isotropic dense data but uses ionising radiation. In this study, we explore the combination of Slice Shifting Algorithm (SSA), Spatial Transformer Network (STN), and Label Transformer Network (LTN) to: 1) correct respiratory motion between segmented slices, and 2) transform sparse segmentation data into dense segmentation. All combinations were validated using synthetic motion-corrupted CMR slice segmentation generated from CT in 1699 cases, where the dense CT serves as the ground truth. In 199 testing cases, SSA-LTN achieved the best results for Dice score and Huasdorff distance (94.0% and 4.7 mm respectively, average over 5 labels) but gave topological errors in 8 cases. STN was effective as a plug-in tool for correcting all topological errors with minimal impact on overall performance (93.5% and 5.0 mm respectively). SSA also proves to be a valuable plug-in tool, enhancing performance over both STN-based and LTN-based models. The code for these different combinations is available at https://github.com/XESchong/STACOM2024.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑