arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.14736q-fin.CPq-fin.RM
收藏

深度对冲与Delta对冲之间的差异是否构成统计套利?

Is the difference between deep hedging and delta hedging a statistical arbitrage?

Pascal François, Geneviève Gauthier, Frédéric Godin, Carlos Octavio Pérez Mendoza

AI总结:

本文在GARCH市场模型下检验深度对冲与Delta对冲的差异是否构成统计套利,发现若风险度量对不利结果权重不足则该差异具有投机性,而合理选择风险度量可避免深度对冲中的投机行为。

摘要:

Horikawa和Nakagawa(2024)的近期工作声称,在一个允许统计套利的完备市场中,深度对冲提供的对冲头寸与复制组合的对冲头寸之间的差异是一种统计套利。这引发了担忧,因为这意味着深度对冲可能包含一个投机性成分,其目的仅仅是利用指导对冲优化问题的风险度量的结构。我们检验这一发现在基于GARCH的市场模型中是否仍然成立,该模型是一个偏离完备市场动态的说明性案例。我们观察到,如果所考虑的风险度量没有对不利结果赋予足够的相对权重,那么深度对冲与Delta对冲之间的差异就是一种投机性叠加。然而,适当选择风险度量可以防止深度对冲代理从事投机活动。

英文摘要:

The recent work of Horikawa and Nakagawa (2024) claims that under a complete market admitting statistical arbitrage, the difference between the hedging position provided by deep hedging and that of the replicating portfolio is a statistical arbitrage. This raises concerns as it entails that deep hedging can include a speculative component aimed simply at exploiting the structure of the risk measure guiding the hedging optimisation problem. We test whether such finding remains true in a GARCH-based market model, which is an illustrative case departing from complete market dynamics. We observe that the difference between deep hedging and delta hedging is a speculative overlay if the risk measure considered does not put sufficient relative weight on adverse outcomes. Nevertheless, a suitable choice of risk measure can prevent the deep hedging agent from engaging in speculation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑