arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2407.04842cs.CVcs.CLcs.LG
收藏

MJ-Bench:你的多模态奖励模型真的是文本到图像生成的好裁判吗?

MJ-Bench: Is Your Multimodal Reward Model Really a Good Judge for Text-to-Image Generation?

University of Chicago(芝加哥大学);NUS(新加坡国立大学);Stanford University(斯坦福大学);UCSC(加州大学圣克鲁兹分校);Duke University(杜克大学);ESSEC(埃塞克高等商学院);Illinois Tech(伊利诺伊理工学院);UCSD(加州大学圣地亚哥分校);Peking University(北京大学);University of Queensland(昆士兰大学);Stony Brook University(石溪大学);UNC-Chapel Hill(北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校);USTC(中国科学技术大学)
Zhaorun Chen, Yichao Du, Zichen Wen, Yiyang Zhou, Chenhang Cui, Zhenzhen Weng, Haoqin Tu, Chaoqi Wang, Zhengwei Tong, Qinglan Huang, Canyu Chen, Qinghao Ye, Zhi… 展开作者

Zhaorun Chen, Yichao Du, Zichen Wen, Yiyang Zhou, Chenhang Cui, Zhenzhen Weng, Haoqin Tu, Chaoqi Wang, Zhengwei Tong, Qinglan Huang, Canyu Chen, Qinghao Ye, Zhihong Zhu, Yuqing Zhang, Jiawei Zhou, Zhuokai Zhao, Rafael Rafailov, Chelsea Finn, Huaxiu Yao

AI总结:

本文提出 MJ-Bench 基准,系统评估多模态裁判在文本到图像生成中的对齐、安全、质量和偏见反馈能力,发现闭源 VLM 整体更优,并验证了其对模型微调的实际指导价值。

摘要:

虽然 DALLE-3 和 Stable Diffusion 等文本到图像模型正在迅速普及,但它们经常遇到幻觉、偏见以及产生不安全、低质量输出等挑战。为了有效解决这些问题,关键是要根据多模态裁判的反馈,使这些模型与期望的行为对齐。尽管多模态裁判具有重要意义,但当前的多模态裁判在能力和局限性方面经常得不到充分评估,这可能导致对齐错误和不安全的微调结果。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了 MJ-Bench,这是一个新颖的基准,它包含一个全面的偏好数据集,用于从四个关键视角评估多模态裁判在为图像生成模型提供反馈时的表现:对齐、安全性、图像质量和偏见。具体而言,我们在偏好数据集的每个分解子类别上评估了多种多模态裁判,包括较小规模的基于 CLIP 的评分模型、开源 VLM(例如 LLaVA 系列)和闭源 VLM(例如 GPT-4o、Claude 3)。实验表明,闭源 VLM 通常能提供更好的反馈,其中 GPT-4o 在平均值上优于其他裁判。与开源 VLM 相比,较小规模的评分模型在文本-图像对齐和图像质量方面能提供更好的反馈,而 VLM 由于具有更强的推理能力,在安全性和生成偏见方面能提供更准确的反馈。对反馈尺度的进一步研究表明,VLM 裁判通常能以自然语言(Likert 量表)提供比数值量表更准确、更稳定的反馈。值得注意的是,使用来自这些多模态裁判的独立反馈对端到端微调模型进行的人工评估得出了类似的结论,进一步证实了 MJ-Bench 的有效性。所有数据、代码和模型均可在 https://huggingface.co/MJ-Bench 获取。

英文摘要:

While text-to-image models like DALLE-3 and Stable Diffusion are rapidly proliferating, they often encounter challenges such as hallucination, bias, and the production of unsafe, low-quality output. To effectively address these issues, it is crucial to align these models with desired behaviors based on feedback from a multimodal judge. Despite their significance, current multimodal judges frequently undergo inadequate evaluation of their capabilities and limitations, potentially leading to misalignment and unsafe fine-tuning outcomes. To address this issue, we introduce MJ-Bench, a novel benchmark which incorporates a comprehensive preference dataset to evaluate multimodal judges in providing feedback for image generation models across four key perspectives: alignment, safety, image quality, and bias. Specifically, we evaluate a large variety of multimodal judges including smaller-sized CLIP-based scoring models, open-source VLMs (e.g. LLaVA family), and close-source VLMs (e.g. GPT-4o, Claude 3) on each decomposed subcategory of our preference dataset. Experiments reveal that close-source VLMs generally provide better feedback, with GPT-4o outperforming other judges in average. Compared with open-source VLMs, smaller-sized scoring models can provide better feedback regarding text-image alignment and image quality, while VLMs provide more accurate feedback regarding safety and generation bias due to their stronger reasoning capabilities. Further studies in feedback scale reveal that VLM judges can generally provide more accurate and stable feedback in natural language (Likert-scale) than numerical scales. Notably, human evaluations on end-to-end fine-tuned models using separate feedback from these multimodal judges provide similar conclusions, further confirming the effectiveness of MJ-Bench. All data, code, models are available at https://huggingface.co/MJ-Bench.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑