arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.13028cs.CVcs.CL
收藏

面向细粒度图像编辑评估的人类对齐MLLM评判:一个基准、框架和分析

Human-Aligned MLLM Judges for Fine-Grained Image Editing Evaluation: A Benchmark, Framework, and Analysis

University of Virginia(弗吉尼亚大学);Columbia University(哥伦比亚大学);Vanderbilt University(范德比大学);Adobe Research(Adobe研究);Dolby Laboratories(杜比实验室);Cisco Research(思科研究);University of Southern California(南加州大学);University of Wisconsin-Madison(威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校);University of Oregon(俄勒冈大学);Texas A&M University(德克萨斯大学)
Runzhou Liu, Hailey Weingord, Sejal Mittal, Prakhar Dungarwal, Anusha Nandula, Bo Ni, Samyadeep Basu, Hongjie Chen, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Li Li, Jiayi Zhang, Kousta… 展开作者

Runzhou Liu, Hailey Weingord, Sejal Mittal, Prakhar Dungarwal, Anusha Nandula, Bo Ni, Samyadeep Basu, Hongjie Chen, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Li Li, Jiayi Zhang, Koustava Goswami, Subhojyoti Mukherjee, Branislav Kveton, Puneet Mathur, Franck Dernoncourt, Yue Zhao, Yu Wang, Ryan A. Rossi, Zhengzhong Tu, Hongru Du

AI总结:

本文提出细粒度MLLM评判框架,通过分解十二个可解释因素,提升图像编辑评估的精度与实用性,为研究和改进图像编辑方法提供实用基础。

摘要:

评估图像编辑模型仍然具有挑战性,因为传统度量标准的粗粒度和有限的可解释性,往往无法捕捉人类感知和意图方面的重要因素。这些度量标准通常奖励视觉上合理的输出,而忽视了可控性、编辑定位和对用户指令的忠实度。在本工作中,我们引入了一个细粒度的多模态大语言模型(MLLM)作为评判框架,用于图像编辑,将常见的评估概念分解为十二个细粒度的可解释因素,涵盖图像保留、编辑质量和指令忠实度。基于这一公式,我们提出了一个新的人类验证基准,整合了人类判断、基于MLLM的评估、模型输出和传统度量标准,覆盖多种图像编辑任务。通过广泛的用户研究,我们表明所提出的MLLM评判在细粒度上与人类评估紧密一致,支持其作为可靠且可扩展的评估者。我们进一步表明,传统图像编辑度量标准往往是这些因素的较差代理,无法区分过度编辑或语义不精确的输出,而我们的评判在离线和在线设置中提供了更具直观性和信息量的评估。共同,这项工作引入了一个基准、一个原则性的因素分解和实证证据,将细粒度的MLLM评判定位为研究、比较和改进图像编辑方法的实用基础。

英文摘要:

Evaluating image editing models remains challenging due to the coarse granularity and limited interpretability of traditional metrics, which often fail to capture aspects important to human perception and intent. Such metrics frequently reward visually plausible outputs while overlooking controllability, edit localization, and faithfulness to user instructions. In this work, we introduce a fine-grained Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM)-as-a-Judge framework for image editing that decomposes common evaluation notions into twelve fine-grained interpretable factors spanning image preservation, edit quality, and instruction fidelity. Building on this formulation, we present a new human-validated benchmark that integrates human judgments, MLLM-based evaluations, model outputs, and traditional metrics across diverse image editing tasks. Through extensive human studies, we show that the proposed MLLM judges align closely with human evaluations at a fine granularity, supporting their use as reliable and scalable evaluators. We further demonstrate that traditional image editing metrics are often poor proxies for these factors, failing to distinguish over-edited or semantically imprecise outputs, whereas our judges provide more intuitive and informative assessments in both offline and online settings. Together, this work introduces a benchmark, a principled factorization, and empirical evidence positioning fine-grained MLLM judges as a practical foundation for studying, comparing, and improving image editing approaches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑