arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.04788cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
收藏

MLLM-as-a-Judge:利用视觉-语言基准评估多模态大语言模型作为评判者的能力

MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark

Huazhong University of Science and Technology(华中科技大学);Zhejiang University of Technology(浙江工业大学);Lehigh University(里海大学)

Dongping Chen, Ruoxi Chen, Shilin Zhang, Yinuo Liu, Yaochen Wang, Huichi Zhou, Qihui Zhang, Yao Wan, Pan Zhou, Lichao Sun

AI总结:

本文提出MLLM-as-a-Judge基准,通过评分评估、成对比较和批量排序三个任务系统评估多模态大语言模型作为评判者的能力,揭示了其与人类偏好的显著差异及偏见、幻觉等问题。

摘要:

多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)近年来受到广泛关注,展现出在通用人工智能领域的显著潜力。然而,评估MLLMs的实用性面临相当大的挑战,主要原因是缺乏与人类偏好相一致的多模态基准。受大语言模型中LLM-as-a-Judge概念的启发,本文引入了一个名为MLLM-as-a-Judge的新基准,用于评估MLLMs在不同模态下辅助评判者的能力,涵盖三个不同的任务:评分评估、成对比较和批量排序。我们的研究表明,尽管MLLMs在成对比较中表现出显著的人类般的辨别能力,但在评分评估和批量排序中与人类偏好存在显著差异。此外,更深入的研究揭示了LLMs在判断能力方面的持续挑战,包括多种偏见、幻觉性回答以及判断不一致性,即使在GPT-4V等先进模型中也是如此。这些发现强调了在将MLLMs视为完全可靠的评估者之前,迫切需要对其进行改进和进一步研究。鉴于此,我们倡导投入更多努力,支持MLLM作为评判者领域的持续发展。代码和数据集已在我们项目主页公开:\url{https://mllm-judge.github.io/}。

英文摘要:

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained significant attention recently, showing remarkable potential in artificial general intelligence. However, assessing the utility of MLLMs presents considerable challenges, primarily due to the absence of multimodal benchmarks that align with human preferences. Drawing inspiration from the concept of LLM-as-a-Judge within LLMs, this paper introduces a novel benchmark, termed MLLM-as-a-Judge, to assess the ability of MLLMs in assisting judges across diverse modalities, encompassing three distinct tasks: Scoring Evaluation, Pair Comparison, and Batch Ranking. Our study reveals that, while MLLMs demonstrate remarkable human-like discernment in Pair Comparison, there is a significant divergence from human preferences in Scoring Evaluation and Batch Ranking. Furthermore, a closer examination reveals persistent challenges in the judgment capacities of LLMs, including diverse biases, hallucinatory responses, and inconsistencies in judgment, even in advanced models such as GPT-4V. These findings emphasize the pressing need for enhancements and further research efforts to be undertaken before regarding MLLMs as fully reliable evaluators. In light of this, we advocate for additional efforts dedicated to supporting the continuous development within the domain of MLLM functioning as judges. The code and dataset are publicly available at our project homepage: \url{https://mllm-judge.github.io/}.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑