arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.13698cs.CL
收藏

MMTE:用于评估隐喻语言机器翻译质量的语料库与指标

MMTE: Corpus and Metrics for Evaluating Machine Translation Quality of Metaphorical Language

The University of Sheffield(谢菲尔德大学);University of Waterloo(滑铁卢大学);UIBE(对外经济贸易大学);The University of Manchester(曼彻斯特大学)

Shun Wang, Ge Zhang, Han Wu, Tyler Loakman, Wenhao Huang, Chenghua Lin

AI总结:

本文针对机器翻译中比喻性语言质量评估缺失的问题,提出了一套人工评估指标和一个多语言平行隐喻语料库,从隐喻对等性、情感、真实性和质量四方面评估,发现比喻表达翻译与字面表达不同。

摘要:

自大型语言模型发布以来,机器翻译(MT)发展迅速,当前的机器翻译评估通过与人参考译文进行比较或根据人工标注数据预测质量分数来进行。然而,这些主流评估方法主要关注流畅性和事实可靠性,而对比喻性质量关注甚少。在本文中,我们研究了机器翻译的比喻性质量,并提出了一套侧重于比喻语言翻译的人工评估指标。此外,我们还提供了一个通过后期编辑生成的多语言平行隐喻语料库。我们的评估协议旨在评估机器翻译的四个方面:隐喻对等性、情感、真实性和质量。通过这样做,我们观察到比喻性表达的翻译表现出与字面表达不同的特征。

英文摘要:

Machine Translation (MT) has developed rapidly since the release of Large Language Models and current MT evaluation is performed through comparison with reference human translations or by predicting quality scores from human-labeled data. However, these mainstream evaluation methods mainly focus on fluency and factual reliability, whilst paying little attention to figurative quality. In this paper, we investigate the figurative quality of MT and propose a set of human evaluation metrics focused on the translation of figurative language. We additionally present a multilingual parallel metaphor corpus generated by post-editing. Our evaluation protocol is designed to estimate four aspects of MT: Metaphorical Equivalence, Emotion, Authenticity, and Quality. In doing so, we observe that translations of figurative expressions display different traits from literal ones.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑