arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2406.01690hep-th
收藏

几乎是经典的de Sitter?

Almost classical de Sitter?

Ludwig Horer, Daniel Junghans

AI总结:

本文研究了II型弦理论中经典dS方案的最小扩展,探讨了包含4阶导数弦修正对O平面/D膜作用量的影响,发现该修正不允许包含O8/D8或O6/D6平面的模型中存在亚稳态de Sitter真空。

摘要:

II型弦理论中的经典dS方案提出,在弦对紧化有效场论的修正可忽略的区间内,寻找orientifold flux紧化的dS真空。我们研究了该方案的一个最小扩展,其中包含了O平面/D膜作用量在4阶导数阶的领先弦修正,但更高阶修正以及体中的弦修正则被自洽地忽略。我们的提议是由最近关于带O8平面的dS解的争论所推动的,这些解由于不寻常的源绕过了一个经典的no-go定理,从而为10D超引力场导致了所谓的permissive边界条件。我们论证了此类源不会在经典超引力中产生,但探讨了包含4阶导数修正是否会导致具有类似效应的源。然而,我们发现4阶导数修正在我们所考虑的包含O8平面和/或D8膜的模型类中不允许亚稳态dS。我们还研究了另外包含O6平面/D6膜的相关模型,发现无论是在经典情况下还是包含4阶导数修正时,都不允许亚稳态dS。虽然本工作中的一些论证要求O平面/D膜源的反演效应较小,但其他论证在包含完整反演效应时依然有效。

英文摘要:

The classical-dS scenario in the type II string theories proposes to search for dS vacua of orientifold flux compactifications in a regime where string corrections to the compactified effective field theory are negligible. We study a minimal extension of this scenario in which the leading string corrections to the O-plane/D-brane actions at the 4-derivative order are included but higher orders as well as string corrections in the bulk are self-consistently neglected. Our proposal is motivated by a recent debate about dS solutions with O8-planes which circumvent a classical no-go theorem due to unusual sources leading to so-called permissive boundary conditions for the 10D supergravity fields. We argue that such sources do not arise in classical supergravity but ask whether including the 4-derivative corrections leads to sources that have a similar effect. However, we find that the 4-derivative corrections do not allow meta-stable dS in a class of models with O8-planes and/or D8-branes we consider. We also study related models which in addition contain O6-planes/D6-branes and find that again no meta-stable dS is allowed, both classically and including the 4-derivative corrections. While some of the arguments in this work require the backreaction of the O-plane/D-brane sources to be small, others are valid including the full backreaction.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑