arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2405.08095quant-phmath-phmath.MP

伪厄米量子力学中的系统分解

Decomposition of a system in pseudo-Hermitian quantum mechanics

Himanshu Badhani, Sibasish Ghosh

AI总结:

针对伪厄米量子力学中复合系统子系统定义依赖张量积形式度量算符的问题,本研究基于C*-代数分解证明任意度量下子系统均可良定义,且满足无信号原理,使不同度量选择地位平等。

摘要:

本研究提出了一种在有限维希尔伯特空间中识别子系统的自洽方法,该方法不依赖于底层的内积结构。这类希尔伯特空间出现在$\u2702\u2702$-对称量子力学中,其中非厄米哈密顿量通过所谓的“度量算符”改变内积而成为自伴算符,这正是伪厄米量子力学的框架。对于该框架下的复合量子系统,通常认为只有当度量算符取张量积形式时子系统才有定义,这样偏迹运算才能被良好定义。本研究利用代数量子力学的论证表明,无论度量是否为张量积形式,子系统在每个度量空间中都可以被良好定义,其实现方式是将子系统对应为底层C*-代数分解为的相互对易的子代数。尽管已知度量的选择对系统的统计特性没有影响,但我们证明不同的度量选择会导致不等价的子系统分解。每个子系统都可以通过层析方法构建,且这些子系统满足无信号原理。基于这些结果,我们让复合系统中所有度量算符的选择都处于同等地位。

英文摘要:

This work outlines a consistent method of identifying subsystems in finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, independent of the underlying inner-product structure. Such Hilbert spaces arise in $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$-symmetric quantum mechanics, where a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is made self-adjoint by changing the inner product using the so-called ``metric operator". This is the framework of pseudo-Hermitian quantum mechanics. For composite quantum systems in this framework, defining subsystems is generally considered feasible only when the metric operator is chosen to have a tensor product form so that a partial trace operation can be well defined. In this work, we use arguments from algebraic quantum mechanics to show that the subsystems can be well-defined in every metric space - irrespective of whether or not the metric is of tensor product form. This is done by identifying subsystems with a decomposition of the underlying C*-algebra into commuting subalgebras. Although the choice of the metric is known to have no effect on the system's statistics, we show that different choices of the metric can lead to inequivalent subsystem decompositions. Each of the subsystems can be tomographically constructed and these subsystems satisfy the no-signalling principle. With these results, we put all the choices of the metric operator on an equal footing for composite systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑