arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2404.08066cs.CL
收藏

MSciNLI:面向科学自然语言推理的多样化基准

MSciNLI: A Diverse Benchmark for Scientific Natural Language Inference

University of Illinois Chicago(伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校);Computer Science(计算机科学学院)

Mobashir Sadat, Cornelia Caragea

AI总结:

本文提出包含5个新科学领域132320个句子对的MSciNLI数据集以丰富科学NLI任务多样性,建立PLM和LLM基线验证其挑战性,证实领域偏移的影响,并表明该类数据集可提升科学领域下游任务性能。

摘要:

科学自然语言推理(NLI)任务旨在预测从研究论文中提取的两个句子之间的语义关系。该任务是近期与一个名为SciNLI的新数据集一同被提出的,该数据集源自计算语言学领域发表的论文。本文旨在为科学NLI任务引入多样性,并提出MSciNLI数据集,该数据集包含从5个新的科学领域中提取的132320个句子对。多领域的可用性使得研究科学NLI的领域偏移成为可能。我们通过微调预训练语言模型(PLMs)和提示大语言模型(LLMs),在MSciNLI上建立了强基线。PLM和LLM基线的最高宏F1分数分别为77.21%和51.77%,表明MSciNLI对这两类模型都具有挑战性。此外,我们发现领域偏移会降低科学NLI模型的性能,这证明了我们数据集中不同领域的多样性特征。最后,我们在中间任务迁移学习设置中使用了这两个科学NLI数据集,并证明它们可以提升科学领域下游任务的性能。我们已在Github上公开了数据集和代码。

英文摘要:

The task of scientific Natural Language Inference (NLI) involves predicting the semantic relation between two sentences extracted from research articles. This task was recently proposed along with a new dataset called SciNLI derived from papers published in the computational linguistics domain. In this paper, we aim to introduce diversity in the scientific NLI task and present MSciNLI, a dataset containing 132,320 sentence pairs extracted from five new scientific domains. The availability of multiple domains makes it possible to study domain shift for scientific NLI. We establish strong baselines on MSciNLI by fine-tuning Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) and prompting Large Language Models (LLMs). The highest Macro F1 scores of PLM and LLM baselines are 77.21% and 51.77%, respectively, illustrating that MSciNLI is challenging for both types of models. Furthermore, we show that domain shift degrades the performance of scientific NLI models which demonstrates the diverse characteristics of different domains in our dataset. Finally, we use both scientific NLI datasets in an intermediate task transfer learning setting and show that they can improve the performance of downstream tasks in the scientific domain. We make our dataset and code available on Github.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑