arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.01976cs.CL
收藏

SciAssess:评估大语言模型在科学文献分析中的熟练程度

SciAssess: Benchmarking LLM Proficiency in Scientific Literature Analysis

DP Technology AI for Science Institute(DP Technology AI for Science研究所)
Hengxing Cai, Xiaochen Cai, Junhan Chang, Sihang Li, Lin Yao, Changxin Wang, Zhifeng Gao, Hongshuai Wang, Yongge Li, Mujie Lin, Shuwen Yang, Jiankun Wang, Mingj… 展开作者

Hengxing Cai, Xiaochen Cai, Junhan Chang, Sihang Li, Lin Yao, Changxin Wang, Zhifeng Gao, Hongshuai Wang, Yongge Li, Mujie Lin, Shuwen Yang, Jiankun Wang, Mingjun Xu, Jin Huang, Xi Fang, Jiaxi Zhuang, Yuqi Yin, Yaqi Li, Changhong Chen, Zheng Cheng, Zifeng Zhao, Linfeng Zhang, Guolin Ke

AI总结:

针对现有基准难以充分评估LLMs在科学文献分析中高阶能力与多模态处理能力的问题,本文提出SciAssess基准,从记忆、理解、分析与推理三个层级评估11个LLMs,为领域发展提供可靠评测资源。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLMs)的近期突破已经彻底改变了科学文献分析。然而,现有基准未能充分评估LLMs在该领域的熟练程度,特别是在需要超越单纯记忆的高阶能力以及处理多模态数据的场景中。针对这一空白,我们引入了SciAssess,一个专为全面评估LLMs在科学文献分析中的表现而设计的基准。它旨在通过评估LLMs在记忆(L1)、理解(L2)以及分析与推理(L3)方面的能力,来全面衡量LLMs的效能。它涵盖了来自不同科学领域的多种任务,包括生物学、化学、材料和医学。为确保SciAssess的可靠性,我们实施了严格的质量控制措施,以保证准确性、匿名化以及符合版权标准。SciAssess评估了11个LLMs,突出了它们的优势与待改进之处。我们希望这一评估能够支持LLMs在科学文献分析中应用的持续发展。SciAssess及其资源可在\url{https://github.com/sci-assess/SciAssess}获取。

英文摘要:

Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized scientific literature analysis. However, existing benchmarks fail to adequately evaluate the proficiency of LLMs in this domain, particularly in scenarios requiring higher-level abilities beyond mere memorization and the handling of multimodal data. In response to this gap, we introduce SciAssess, a benchmark specifically designed for the comprehensive evaluation of LLMs in scientific literature analysis. It aims to thoroughly assess the efficacy of LLMs by evaluating their capabilities in Memorization (L1), Comprehension (L2), and Analysis \& Reasoning (L3). It encompasses a variety of tasks drawn from diverse scientific fields, including biology, chemistry, material, and medicine. To ensure the reliability of SciAssess, rigorous quality control measures have been implemented, ensuring accuracy, anonymization, and compliance with copyright standards. SciAssess evaluates 11 LLMs, highlighting their strengths and areas for improvement. We hope this evaluation supports the ongoing development of LLM applications in scientific literature analysis. SciAssess and its resources are available at \url{https://github.com/sci-assess/SciAssess}.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑