arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
稍安勿躁,官方尚未更新
arXiv 2404.00751stat.MLcs.LGstat.ME
收藏

C-XGBoost:一种用于因果效应估计的树提升模型

C-XGBoost: A tree boosting model for causal effect estimation

Harokopio University of Athens(雅典哈罗科皮奥大学);University of Piraeus(比雷埃夫斯大学)

Niki Kiriakidou, Ioannis E. Livieris, Christos Diou

AI总结:

本文提出C-XGBoost因果推断模型,结合树模型处理表格数据的优势与神经网络表示学习能力,并设计新损失函数,实验验证其在因果效应估计中的有效性。

摘要:

因果效应估计旨在从可用数据中估计处理对结果的平均处理效应以及条件平均处理效应。这一知识在许多安全关键领域中十分重要,通常需要从观测数据中提取。在本工作中,我们提出了一种新的因果推断模型,命名为C-XGBoost,用于潜在结果的预测。我们方法的动机是利用基于树的模型在处理表格数据方面的优越性,以及基于神经网络的因果推断模型学习对处理组和非处理组结果估计有用表示的显著特性。所提出的模型还继承了XGBoost模型的显著优势,例如高效处理带有缺失值的特征,只需最少的预处理工作,同时配备了正则化技术以避免过拟合或偏差。此外,我们提出了一种新的损失函数,用于高效训练所提出的因果推断模型。基于Dolan和Moré的性能概况以及事后和非参数统计检验的实验分析,为所提出方法的有效性提供了强有力的证据。

英文摘要:

Causal effect estimation aims at estimating the Average Treatment Effect as well as the Conditional Average Treatment Effect of a treatment to an outcome from the available data. This knowledge is important in many safety-critical domains, where it often needs to be extracted from observational data. In this work, we propose a new causal inference model, named C-XGBoost, for the prediction of potential outcomes. The motivation of our approach is to exploit the superiority of tree-based models for handling tabular data together with the notable property of causal inference neural network-based models to learn representations that are useful for estimating the outcome for both the treatment and non-treatment cases. The proposed model also inherits the considerable advantages of XGBoost model such as efficiently handling features with missing values requiring minimum preprocessing effort, as well as it is equipped with regularization techniques to avoid overfitting/bias. Furthermore, we propose a new loss function for efficiently training the proposed causal inference model. The experimental analysis, which is based on the performance profiles of Dolan and Mor{é} as well as on post-hoc and non-parametric statistical tests, provide strong evidence about the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑