In recent years, there have been significant advancements in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs). While their practical applications are now widespread, their potential for misuse, such as generating fake news and committing plagiarism, has posed significant concerns. To address this issue, detectors have been developed to evaluate whether a given text is human-generated or AI-generated. Among others, zero-shot detectors stand out as effective approaches that do not require additional training data and are often likelihood-based. In chat-based applications, users commonly input prompts and utilize the AI-generated texts. However, zero-shot detectors typically analyze these texts in isolation, neglecting the impact of the original prompts. It is conceivable that this approach may lead to a discrepancy in likelihood assessments between the text generation phase and the detection phase. So far, there remains an unverified gap concerning how the presence or absence of prompts impacts detection accuracy for zero-shot detectors. In this paper, we introduce an evaluative framework to empirically analyze the impact of prompts on the detection accuracy of AI-generated text. We assess various zero-shot detectors using both white-box detection, which leverages the prompt, and black-box detection, which operates without prompt information. Our experiments reveal the significant influence of prompts on detection accuracy. Remarkably, compared with black-box detection without prompts, the white-box methods using prompts demonstrate an increase in AUC of at least $0.1$ across all zero-shot detectors tested. Code is available: \url{https://github.com/kaito25atugich/Detector}.
Hint of Pseudo Code (HoPC): Zero-Shot Step by Step Pseudo Code Reasoning Prompting
Department of Computer Science and Technology（计算机科学与技术系）；Institute for Artificial Intelligence at Tsinghua University（清华大学人工智能研究院）；Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology（北京信息科学国家研究中心）；Tsinghua University（清华大学）
Metacognition-Enhanced Few-Shot Prompting With Positive Reinforcement
Institute of AI for Education, East China Normal University（华东师范大学教育人工智能研究院）；School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University（华东师范大学计算机科学与技术学院）；Shanghai Changning Mental Health Center（上海市长宁区精神卫生中心）
Evaluating Prompts Across Multiple Choice Tasks In a Zero-Shot Setting
大语言模型已经表明，通过自然语言提示可以实现令人印象深刻的zero-shot性能（Radford et al.，2019; Brown等人，2020; Sanh等人，2021年）。然而，创建一个有效的提示需要大量的尝试和错误。这就向\textit{prompts}提出了一个问题：提示的质量如何影响它的表现？为此，我们从各种任务中收集并标准化提示，以用于它们不是为之设计的任务。然后，我们在固定的多项选择数据集上评估这些提示，以定量分析提示的某些属性如何影响性能。我们发现，包括选择和使用提示不使用在预培训提供了显着的改善。所有的实验和代码都可以在https://github.com/gabeorlanski/zero-shot-cross-task上找到。
Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm
Institute for Clarity in Documentation（文档清晰性研究所）；Inria Paris-Rocquencourt（法国国家信息与自动化研究所巴黎-罗克库尔中心）；Rajiv Gandhi University（拉吉夫·甘地大学）；Tsinghua University（清华大学）；Palmer Research Laboratories（帕尔默研究实验室）
Retrieval augmented generation based dynamic prompting for few-shot biomedical named entity recognition using large language models
Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Emory University（生物医学信息学系，医学院，埃默里大学）；Department of Computer Science, Emory University（计算机科学系，埃默里大学）；National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health（国家医学图书馆，国立卫生研究院）；Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University（生物医学工程系，佐治亚理工学院和埃默里大学）
Diverge to Induce Prompting: Multi-Rationale Induction for Zero-Shot Reasoning
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan（国家台湾大学计算机科学与信息工程系）；Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan（学术院信息科学研究所）；AI Research Center (AINTU), National Taiwan University, Taiwan（国家台湾大学人工智能研究中心（AINTU））
Meta-Prompting for Automating Zero-shot Visual Recognition with LLMs
ICG, TU Graz（格拉茨工业大学ICG研究所）；CDL-EML（CDL-EML中心）；MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab（麻省理工学院-IBM沃森人工智能实验室）；JKU（约翰内斯开普勒大学）；IBM Research（IBM研究院）；Weizmann Institute of Science（魏茨曼科学研究所）；University of Bonn（波恩大学）
STPrompt: Semantic-guided and Task-driven prompts for Effective Few-shot Classification
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院大学）；Institute of Information Engineering（信息工程研究所）；Beijing Institute of Technology（北京理工大学）；Guangzhou University（广州大学）
LAMPER: LanguAge Model and Prompt EngineeRing for zero-shot time series classification
Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University（清华大学清华大学深圳国际研究生院）；School of Automation, Wuhan University of Technology（武汉理工大学自动化学院）
