arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.04294cs.CLcs.AIcs.CR
收藏

少样本演示如何影响基于提示的对抗LLM劫持攻击防御

How Few-shot Demonstrations Affect Prompt-based Defenses Against LLM Jailbreak Attacks

Peking University(北京大学)

Yanshu Wang, Shuaishuai Yang, Jingjing He, Tong Yang

AI总结:

本文研究少样本演示对基于提示的LLM防御策略的影响,发现其对RoP和ToP产生相反效果,提出实用部署建议。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)面临越来越多的劫持攻击威胁,这些攻击能够绕过安全对齐。尽管基于提示的防御方法,如基于角色的提示(RoP)和基于任务的提示(ToP),已显示出有效性,但少样本演示在这些防御策略中的作用仍不明确。先前的研究表明,少样本示例可能会损害安全性,但缺乏对少样本如何与不同系统提示策略相互作用的调查。在本文中,我们对多个主流LLM在四个安全基准(AdvBench、HarmBench、SG-Bench、XSTest)上使用六种劫持攻击方法进行了全面评估。我们的关键发现揭示了少样本演示对RoP和ToP产生相反效果:少样本增强了RoP的安全率,通过加强角色身份,提高了多达4.5%;而它通过使注意力偏离任务指示,使ToP的效果降低了多达21.2%。基于这些发现,我们为在现实世界LLM应用中部署基于提示的防御提供了实用建议。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) face increasing threats from jailbreak attacks that bypass safety alignment. While prompt-based defenses such as Role-Oriented Prompts (RoP) and Task-Oriented Prompts (ToP) have shown effectiveness, the role of few-shot demonstrations in these defense strategies remains unclear. Prior work suggests that few-shot examples may compromise safety, but lacks investigation into how few-shot interacts with different system prompt strategies. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation on multiple mainstream LLMs across four safety benchmarks (AdvBench, HarmBench, SG-Bench, XSTest) using six jailbreak attack methods. Our key finding reveals that few-shot demonstrations produce opposite effects on RoP and ToP: few-shot enhances RoP's safety rate by up to 4.5% through reinforcing role identity, while it degrades ToP's effectiveness by up to 21.2% through distracting attention from task instructions. Based on these findings, we provide practical recommendations for deploying prompt-based defenses in real-world LLM applications.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑