arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2403.11981cs.CRcs.CVcs.LG

基于扩散去噪的干净标签投毒认证鲁棒性

Certified Robustness to Clean-Label Poisoning Using Diffusion Denoising

Sanghyun Hong, Nicholas Carlini, Alexey Kurakin

AI总结:

本文提出一种基于扩散去噪模型的认证防御方法,用于抵御干净标签投毒攻击,在七种攻击下将成功率降至0-16%且几乎不影响测试准确率,优于现有对策。

摘要:

我们提出了一种在 $\ell_2$ 范数下针对干净标签投毒攻击的认证防御方法。这类攻击通过向训练数据中注入少量(例如 1%)包含有界对抗扰动的投毒样本,诱导测试时输入发生目标性错误分类。受随机平滑所取得的对抗鲁棒性启发,我们展示了现成的扩散去噪模型如何能够净化被篡改的训练数据。我们在 $\ell_2$ 和 $\ell_{\infty}$ 范数下对七种干净标签投毒攻击进行了广泛测试,将它们的攻击成功率降低到 0-16%,而测试准确率仅出现可忽略的下降。我们将所提出的防御方法与现有的干净标签投毒对策进行了比较,结果表明该防御方法对攻击成功率的降低幅度最大,并且提供了最佳的模型效用。我们的结果凸显了未来工作需要开发更强的干净标签攻击,并将我们的认证且实用的防御方法作为评估这些攻击的强基线。

英文摘要:

We present a certified defense to clean-label poisoning attacks under $\ell_2$-norm. These attacks work by injecting a small number of poisoning samples (e.g., 1%) that contain bounded adversarial perturbations into the training data to induce a targeted misclassification of a test-time input. Inspired by the adversarial robustness achieved by $randomized$ $smoothing$, we show how an off-the-shelf diffusion denoising model can sanitize the tampered training data. We extensively test our defense against seven clean-label poisoning attacks in both $\ell_2$ and $\ell_{\infty}$-norms and reduce their attack success to 0-16% with only a negligible drop in the test accuracy. We compare our defense with existing countermeasures against clean-label poisoning, showing that the defense reduces the attack success the most and offers the best model utility. Our results highlight the need for future work on developing stronger clean-label attacks and using our certified yet practical defense as a strong baseline to evaluate these attacks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑