arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2109.08266cs.LGcs.CR

Hard to Forget: Poisoning Attacks on Certified Machine Unlearning

School of Computing and Information Systems(计算与信息系统学院);University of Melbourne(墨尔本大学);Department of Computer Science(计算机科学系);Amherst College(阿默斯特学院)

Neil G. Marchant, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein, Scott Alfeld

英文摘要:

The right to erasure requires removal of a user's information from data held by organizations, with rigorous interpretations extending to downstream products such as learned models. Retraining from scratch with the particular user's data omitted fully removes its influence on the resulting model, but comes with a high computational cost. Machine "unlearning" mitigates the cost incurred by full retraining: instead, models are updated incrementally, possibly only requiring retraining when approximation errors accumulate. Rapid progress has been made towards privacy guarantees on the indistinguishability of unlearned and retrained models, but current formalisms do not place practical bounds on computation. In this paper we demonstrate how an attacker can exploit this oversight, highlighting a novel attack surface introduced by machine unlearning. We consider an attacker aiming to increase the computational cost of data removal. We derive and empirically investigate a poisoning attack on certified machine unlearning where strategically designed training data triggers complete retraining when removed.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑