arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.09115cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallphysics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
收藏

结构变化对g-C₃N₄ X射线吸收谱的影响:来自DFT和TDDFT模拟的见解

Effects of Structural Variations to X-ray Absorption Spectra of g-C$_3$N$_4$: Insights from DFT and TDDFT Simulations

Jun-Rong Zhang, Sheng-Yu Wang, Minrui Wei, Qiang Fu, Weijie Hua

AI总结:

本文通过DFT和TDDFT模拟研究了平面、波纹和微波纹三种g-C₃N₄结构的X射线吸收谱,揭示了不同实验光谱差异源于结构变化,并验证了多种芯空穴近似和轨道分析方法在谱学解释中的适用性。

摘要:

X射线吸收谱(XAS)被广泛用于石墨相氮化碳(g-C₃N₄)及其复合材料的结构表征。然而,即使对于纯g-C₃N₄,不同实验之间在能量和谱形上也存在差异,这可归因于不同合成条件和校准程序导致的结构变化。在此,我们对三种具有代表性的g-C₃N₄结构(平面型、波纹型和微波纹型)进行了XAS理论研究,这些结构采用不同策略优化,以理解结构-光谱关系。比较了不同方法,包括采用全芯空穴(FCH)或等效芯空穴(ECH)近似的密度泛函理论(DFT),以及含时密度泛函理论(TDDFT)。FCH负责获得准确的绝对吸收能量;而ECH和TDDFT分别通过ECH态正则分子轨道(ECH-CMOs)和自然跃迁轨道(NTOs)辅助解释光谱。每种方法下,三种结构的光谱都显示出明显差异,这些差异可与不同的单独实验或介于两者之间的实验结果相关联。我们的计算解释了不同实验之间光谱差异背后的结构原因。此外,这些方法预测的谱形也表现出一致性,因此它们的差异可以作为其准确性的可靠指标。ECH-CMOs和NTO粒子轨道都得出了相似的图形,验证了它们在解释跃迁中的适用性。这项工作对g-C₃N₄的结构-XAS关系进行了全面分析,为各种实验中报道的光谱差异提供了具体解释,并为未来结构动力学和瞬态X射线光谱分析提供了见解。

英文摘要:

X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is widely employed for structure characterization of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C$_3$N$_4$) and its composites. Nevertheless, even for pure g-C$_3$N$_4$, discrepancies in energy and profile exist across different experiments, which can be attributed to variations in structures arising from diverse synthesis conditions and calibration procedures. Here, we conducted a theoretical investigation on XAS of three representative g-C$_3$N$_4$ structures (planar, corrugated, and micro-corrugated) optimized with different strategies, to understand the structure-spectroscopy relation. Different methods were compared, including density functional theory (DFT) with the full (FCH) or equivalent (ECH) core-hole approximation, as well as the time-dependent DFT (TDDFT). FCH was responsible for getting accurate absolute absorption energy; while ECH and TDDFT aided in interpreting the spectra, through ECH-state canonical molecular orbitals (ECH-CMOs) and natural transition orbitals (NTOs), respectively. With each method, the spectra at the three structures show evident differences, which can be correlated to different individual experiments or in between. Our calculations explained the structural reason behind the spectral discrepancies among different experiments. Moreover, profiles predicted by these methods also displayed consistency, so their differences can be used as a reliable indicator of their accuracy. Both ECH-CMOs and NTO particle orbitals led to similar graphics, validating their applicability in interpreting the transitions. This work provides a comprehensive analysis of the structure-XAS relation for g-C$_3$N$_4$, provides concrete explanations for the spectral differences reported in various experiments, and offers insight for future structure dynamical and transient X-ray spectral analyses.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑