Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) like ChatGPT has swiftly entered organizations without adequate governance, posing both opportunities and risks. Limited research addresses organizational governance from both technical and business perspectives. This gap is particularly relevant for international businesses, where differences in regulation, language, and business environments complicate governance. While multiple frameworks for AI governance exist, this needed diversity is lacking for GenAI. This review paper fills this gap by surveying recent literature to better understand the fundamental characteristics of GenAI and to adapt existing governance frameworks specifically to GenAI. The resulting framework delineates scope, objectives, and governance mechanisms designed to both harness business opportunities and mitigate risks associated with GenAI integration. We theorize a distinctive property of GenAI governance: its scope is endogenous to use. Unlike conventional organizational AI, for which governance is organized around a fixed artifact (e.g., model, intended use), GenAI allows users to reconfigure the artifact (e.g., its behavior and risk). Consequently, the object of governance is not fixed ex ante but is partly constituted through use.
Challenges and Best Practices in Corporate AI Governance:Lessons from the Biopharmaceutical Industry
Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford（牛津大学牛津互联网研究院）；Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton University（普林斯顿大学信息技术政策中心）；AstraZeneca（阿斯利康）；University of Bologna（博洛尼亚大学）
When Should Algorithms Resign? A Proposal for AI Governance
Center for Data Science, New York University（纽约大学数据科学中心）；The Alan Turing Institute（艾伦·图灵研究所）；Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge（剑桥大学法学院）；Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society（伯克曼 Klein 互联网与社会中心）
Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo（东京大学未来创成机构）；Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC（德勤日本有限责任公司）；Toyo University（东洋大学）；CDLE, AI Legal (NEC)（日本电气股份有限公司AI法律中心CDLE）；IRCA (International Register of Certified Auditors)（国际注册审计师登记处）
Public Opinion and The Rise of Digital Minds: Perceived Risk, Trust, and Regulation Support
Americans for Responsible Innovation（美国负责任创新组织）；Convergence Analysis（汇聚分析机构）；University of Washington（华盛顿大学）；Texas A&M University（得克萨斯农工大学）；Sentience Institute（感知研究所）；Leiden University（莱顿大学）；National Taiwan University（台湾大学）；National Cheng Kung University（成功大学）；University of Chicago（芝加哥大学）；Stanford University（斯坦福大学）
Democratising Artificial Intelligence for Pandemic Preparedness and Global Governance in Latin American and Caribbean Countries
University of São Paulo（圣保罗大学）；Fundação Getúlio Vargas（热图利奥·瓦加斯基金会）；University of Leipzig（莱比锡大学）；University of Brasília（巴西利亚大学）；Federal University of Technology - Paraná（巴拉那联邦理工大学）；Queen’s University（女王大学）；Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health（哈佛大学陈曾熙公共卫生学院）；Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo（圣多明各自治大学）；Hospital Pediátrico Dr. Hugo Mendoza（雨果·门多萨博士儿科医院）；Universidad Tecnologica de Santiago (UTESA)（圣地亚哥科技大学（UTESA））；Instituto Tecnologico de Santo Domingo (INTEC)（圣多明各技术学院（INTEC））；York University（约克大学）；Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia（卡耶塔诺·埃雷迪亚秘鲁大学）
AI Disclosures Project, Social Science Research Council Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, University College London（AI披露项目，社会科学理事会创新与公共目的研究所，伦敦大学学院）；AI Disclosures Project, Social Science Research Council（AI披露项目，社会科学理事会）；O’Reilly Media（O’Reilly媒体）
Nanyang Technological University（南洋理工大学）；Alibaba-NTU Singapore Joint Research Institute（阿里巴巴-新加坡南洋理工大学联合研究院）；The University of British Columbia（不列颠哥伦比亚大学）；University of Massachusetts Amherst（马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校）；Hong Kong University of Science and Technology（香港科技大学）
Buyer Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Environmental Governance and Supplier Environmental Controversies: An Organizational Information Processing and Signaling
Computable Gap Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Governance in Children's Centres: Evidence-Mechanism-Governance-Indicator Modelling of UNICEF's Guidance on AI and Children 3.0 Based on the Graph-GAP Framework
Dhurakij Pundit University（杜斯特帕尼大学）；The University of Western Australia（西澳大学）；Royal Anthropological Institute（皇家人类学研究所）
A Dual-Helix Governance Approach Towards Reliable Agentic Artificial Intelligence for WebGIS Development
Geographic Information Systems Center, Florida International University（佛罗里达国际大学地理信息系统中心）；Geospatial Analytics, Technology and Open Research Lab, University of Florida（佛罗里达大学地理空间分析、技术与开放研究实验室）
Environmental, Social and Governance Sentiment Analysis on Slovene News: A Novel Dataset and Models
Eindhoven University of Technology（埃因霍温理工大学）；Jožef Stefan Institute（约瑟夫·斯特凡研究所）；University of Ljubljana（卢布尔雅那大学）；Queen Mary University of London（伦敦玛丽女王大学）
