arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.05765cs.ROcs.LG
收藏

约束流形上的物理启发式神经运动规划

Physics-informed Neural Motion Planning on Constraint Manifolds

Purdue University(普渡大学)

Ruiqi Ni, Ahmed H. Qureshi

AI总结:

针对约束流形上约束运动规划(CMP)求解难、需专家数据的问题,提出首个物理启发式CMP框架,通过在约束流形上求解程函方程训练神经函数,无需专家数据,在仿真与真实场景中实现亚秒级高成功率规划,速度远超现有最优方法。

摘要:

约束运动规划(Constrained Motion Planning, CMP)旨在运动学约束流形上的给定起始构型与目标构型之间找到无碰撞路径。这类问题出现在从物体操作到足式机器人运动的各类场景中。然而,流形的零体积特性使CMP问题颇具挑战性,当前最优方法仍需数秒才能找到路径,且模仿学习需要计算成本高昂的路径数据集。近年来,物理启发式运动规划方法兴起,这类方法通过神经网络直接求解程函方程(Eikonal equation)以实现运动规划,且学习过程无需专家演示。受这些方法启发,我们提出首个物理启发式CMP框架,该框架在约束流形上求解程函方程,无需专家数据即可训练用于CMP的神经函数。我们的结果表明,所提方法能在仿真和真实场景中高效求解各类CMP问题,包括朝向约束下的物体操作,以及使用高自由度6-DOF机器人机械臂开门的任务。在这些复杂设置中,我们的方法展现出高成功率,可在亚秒级时间内找到路径,速度是当前最优CMP方法的数倍。

英文摘要:

Constrained Motion Planning (CMP) aims to find a collision-free path between the given start and goal configurations on the kinematic constraint manifolds. These problems appear in various scenarios ranging from object manipulation to legged-robot locomotion. However, the zero-volume nature of manifolds makes the CMP problem challenging, and the state-of-the-art methods still take several seconds to find a path and require a computationally expansive path dataset for imitation learning. Recently, physics-informed motion planning methods have emerged that directly solve the Eikonal equation through neural networks for motion planning and do not require expert demonstrations for learning. Inspired by these approaches, we propose the first physics-informed CMP framework that solves the Eikonal equation on the constraint manifolds and trains neural function for CMP without expert data. Our results show that the proposed approach efficiently solves various CMP problems in both simulation and real-world, including object manipulation under orientation constraints and door opening with a high-dimensional 6-DOF robot manipulator. In these complex settings, our method exhibits high success rates and finds paths in sub-seconds, which is many times faster than the state-of-the-art CMP methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑