arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2405.03411cs.RO

高维状态空间中基于采样的运动规划的贪心启发式算法

Greedy Heuristics for Sampling-Based Motion Planning in High-Dimensional State Spaces

University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies(多伦多大学航空航天研究所);Ton Duc Thang University(越南 ton duc thang 大学(东德盛大学));Singapore University of Technology and Design(新加坡科技设计大学)

Phone Thiha Kyaw, Anh Vu Le, Rajesh Elara Mohan, Jonathan Kelly

AI总结:

研究高维状态空间中基于采样的运动规划问题,提出贪心有信息集,刻画其在类似RRT*规划器中的行为。基于此提出G-RRT*,实验表明它能快速找初始解并渐近收敛到最优路径,性能优于现有采样规划器。

摘要:

有信息采样技术通过将采样偏向状态空间中最有可能产生更好解决方案的区域来加速基于采样的运动规划器的收敛。然而,当当前解路径包含冗余或曲折段时,所得的有信息子集可能仍然不必要地大,减缓收敛。我们之前的工作通过引入贪心有信息集来解决此问题,该集合基于当前解路径上的最大启发式成本减少采样区域。在本文中,我们正式刻画了贪心有信息集在类似快速扩展随机树(RRT*)的规划器中的行为,并分析了贪心采样如何影响探索和渐近最优性。然后我们提出了贪心RRT*(G-RRT*),它是RRT*的双向随时变体型,利用贪心有信息集将采样集中在搜索空间中最有希望的区域。在抽象规划基准、MotionBenchMaker数据集中的操作任务以及双臂Barrett WAM问题上的实验表明,G-RRT*能快速找到初始解并渐近收敛到最优路径,优于现有基于采样的规划器。

英文摘要:

Informed sampling techniques accelerate the convergence of sampling-based motion planners by biasing sampling toward regions of the state space that are most likely to yield better solutions. However, when the current solution path contains redundant or tortuous segments, the resulting informed subset may remain unnecessarily large, slowing convergence. Our prior work addressed this issue by introducing the greedy informed set, which reduces the sampling region based on the maximum heuristic cost along the current solution path. In this article, we formally characterize the behavior of the greedy informed set within Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT*)-like planners and analyze how greedy sampling affects exploration and asymptotic optimality. We then present Greedy RRT* (G-RRT*), a bi-directional anytime variant of RRT* that leverages the greedy informed set to focus sampling in the most promising regions of the search space. Experiments on abstract planning benchmarks, manipulation tasks from the MotionBenchMaker dataset, and a dual-arm Barrett WAM problem demonstrate that G-RRT* rapidly finds initial solutions and converges asymptotically to optimal paths, outperforming state-of-the-art sampling-based planners.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑