arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.05441stat.APcs.LG

日内电力价格的贝叶斯分层概率预测

Bayesian Hierarchical Probabilistic Forecasting of Intraday Electricity Prices

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg(计算统计与数据分析研究所,数学学院,乌尔姆大学)

Daniel Nickelsen, Gernot Müller

AI总结:

本研究首次对德国日内电力价格进行贝叶斯分层概率预测,采用OMP和正则化先验处理协变量,在2022年高波动数据上验证,相比基准和LASSO显著提升预测精度。

摘要:

我们通过纳入参数不确定性并使用广泛的协变量,解决了连续日内市场中电力价格预测方法需应对巨大不确定性的需求。本研究首次对德国日内市场交易的电力价格进行贝叶斯预测。内生和外生协变量通过正交匹配追踪(OMP)和正则化先验进行处理。目标变量为IDFull价格指数,预测以事后预测分布的形式给出。验证使用了波动性极高的2022年电力价格,这些数据鲜有研究。作为基准,我们使用预测时的所有日内交易来计算实时IDFull值。根据市场效率,不应能改进这一最后价格基准。然而,我们观察到在点度量和概率得分方面有显著改进,包括绝对误差平均降低5.9%,以及在预测IDFull是否超过日前价格时准确率平均提高1.7%。最后,我们质疑LASSO在电力价格预测中的使用,表明OMP带来更优性能,具体而言,绝对误差平均降低22.7%,连续排名概率得分平均降低20.2%。

英文摘要:

We address the need for forecasting methodologies that handle large uncertainties in electricity prices for continuous intraday markets by incorporating parameter uncertainty and using a broad set of covariables. This study presents the first Bayesian forecasting of electricity prices traded on the German intraday market. Endogenous and exogenous covariables are handled via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) and regularising priors. The target variable is the IDFull price index, with forecasts given as posterior predictive distributions. Validation uses the highly volatile 2022 electricity prices, which have seldom been studied. As a benchmark, we use all intraday transactions at the time of forecast to compute a live IDFull value. According to market efficiency, it should not be possible to improve on this last-price benchmark. However, we observe significant improvements in point measures and probability scores, including an average reduction of $5.9\,\%$ in absolute errors and an average increase of $1.7\,\%$ in accuracy when forecasting whether the IDFull exceeds the day-ahead price. Finally, we challenge the use of LASSO in electricity price forecasting, showing that OMP results in superior performance, specifically an average reduction of $22.7\,\%$ in absolute error and $20.2\,\%$ in the continuous ranked probability score.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑