arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.07331cs.CCcs.DS

有界树宽图上的基本问题:难度的真正来源

Fundamental Problems on Bounded-Treewidth Graphs: The Real Source of Hardness

Barış Can Esmer, Jacob Focke, Dániel Marx, Paweł Rzążewski

AI总结:

本文证明了在更受限的图结构(即连接到常数大小组件的顶点块)上,多个基本算法问题(如独立集、顶点覆盖等)在SETH或SCC假设下仍具有与一般树分解相同的指数下界难度。

摘要:

对于许多算法问题,已知如果输入中给出了宽度为 $t$ 的树分解,则问题可以在对 $t$ 的指数依赖下解决。Lokshtanov、Marx 和 Saurabh [SODA 2011] 的一系列研究给出了下界,表明在许多情况下,已知算法已经实现了对 $t$ 的最佳可能指数依赖(假设 SETH 成立)。本文的主要信息是表明,在更受限的设置中也能获得相同的下界:由一个包含 $t$ 个顶点的块连接到常数大小组件构成的图,已经具有与宽度为 $t$ 的一般树分解相同的难度。\n形式上,$(σ,δ)$-hub 是一个顶点集 $Q$,使得 $Q$ 的每个组件的大小最多为 $σ$,并且最多与 $Q$ 中的 $δ$ 个顶点相邻。\n$\bullet$ 对于每个 $ε> 0$,存在 $σ,δ> 0$ 使得 Independent Set/Vertex Cover 无法在 $(2-ε)^p\cdot n$ 时间内解决,即使输入中给出了大小为 $p$ 的 $(σ,δ)$-hub(假设 SETH 成立)。这与先前以树分解宽度为参数的紧下界相匹配。对于 Odd Cycle Transversal、Max Cut、$q$-Coloring 以及 $q$-Coloring 的边/顶点删除版本,也获得了类似的紧下界。\n$\bullet$ 对于每个 $ε>0$,存在 $σ,δ> 0$ 使得 Triangle-Partition 无法在 $(2-ε)^p\cdot n$ 时间内解决,即使输入中给出了大小为 $p$ 的 $(σ,δ)$-hub(假设 Set Cover Conjecture (SCC) 成立)。事实上,我们证明该陈述等价于 SCC,因此不太可能在假设 SETH 成立的情况下证明它。\n$\bullet$ 对于 Dominating Set,在假设 SETH 或 SCC 成立的情况下,我们可以证明一个非紧下界,排除了 $(2-ε)^p\cdot n^{O(1)}$ 算法,但这与 $3^p\cdot n^{O(1)}$ 的上界不匹配。

英文摘要:

It is known for many algorithmic problems that if a tree decomposition of width $t$ is given in the input, then the problem can be solved with exponential dependence on $t$. A line of research by Lokshtanov, Marx, and Saurabh [SODA 2011] produced lower bounds showing that in many cases known algorithms achieve the best possible exponential dependence on $t$, assuming the SETH. The main message of our paper is showing that the same lower bounds can be obtained in a more restricted setting: a graph consisting of a block of $t$ vertices connected to components of constant size already has the same hardness as a general tree decomposition of width $t$. Formally, a $(σ,δ)$-hub is a set $Q$ of vertices such that every component of $Q$ has size at most $σ$ and is adjacent to at most $δ$ vertices of $Q$. $\bullet$ For every $ε> 0$, there are $σ,δ> 0$ such that Independent Set/Vertex Cover cannot be solved in time $(2-ε)^p\cdot n$, even if a $(σ,δ)$-hub of size $p$ is given in the input, assuming the SETH. This matches the earlier tight lower bounds parameterized by the width of the tree decomposition. Similar tight bounds are obtained for Odd Cycle Transversal, Max Cut, $q$-Coloring, and edge/vertex deletions versions of $q$-Coloring. $\bullet$ For every $ε>0$, there are $σ,δ> 0$ such that Triangle-Partition cannot be solved in time $(2-ε)^p\cdot n$, even if a $(σ,δ)$-hub of size $p$ is given in the input, assuming the Set Cover Conjecture (SCC). In fact, we prove that this statement is equivalent to the SCC, thus it is unlikely that this could be proved assuming the SETH. $\bullet$ For Dominating Set, we can prove a non-tight lower bound ruling out $(2-ε)^p\cdot n^{O(1)}$ algorithms, assuming either the SETH or the SCC, but this does not match the $3^p\cdot n^{O(1)}$ upper bound.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑