arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2401.07918physics.flu-dyn
收藏

最小通道与更大域通道中壁湍流动力学是否等价?一种图论方法

Are the dynamics of wall turbulence in minimal channels and larger domain channels equivalent? A graph-theoretic approach

Ahmed Elnahhas, Emma Lenz, Parviz Moin, Adrián Lozano-Durán, H. Jane Bae

AI总结:

本文通过图论网络模体分析比较最小流动单元与全通道壁湍流的动力学机制,发现两者主导模体相似但MFU中关键事件时间尺度约慢2.2倍。

摘要:

本工作提出两种算法化方法,以最小人为偏差提取壁面有界湍流中的关键动力学机制。在两种方法中,多种类型的相干结构均被进行时空追踪,从而得到一个复杂的多层网络。网络模体分析,即提取这些网络中的主导非随机基本模式,被用来识别最主要的动力学机制。这两种方法与网络模体分析相结合,被用于回答在 $Re_τ\approx 180$ 时,最小流动单元(MFU)与一个更大的无约束通道流(标记为全通道,FC)的主要动力学机制是否等价。第一种方法追踪传统相干结构,即低速条带、高速条带、喷射和扫掠。结果发现,与当前对自维持过程的理解一致的滚转-条带配对,是两种流动中最显著且最简单的动力学机制。然而,MFU 中该机制的时间尺度大约比 FC 慢 $2.83$ 倍。在第二种方法中,我们使用半拉格朗日波包,并从其含能条带、滚转和小尺度相空间中定义相干结构。该方法同样在 MFU 和 FC 中显示出相似的模体。结果表明,平均而言,两种流动中最主导的相空间模体是相似的,但 MFU 中的重要事件发生速度大约比 FC 慢 $2.21$ 倍。该数值与仅由参与滚转-条带配对的慢速条带所隐含的时间尺度比更为一致,后者通过第一种多类型时空方法提取,在 MFU 中大约比 FC 慢 $2.17$ 倍。

英文摘要:

This work proposes two algorithmic approaches to extract critical dynamical mechanisms in wall-bounded turbulence with minimum human bias. In both approaches, multiple types of coherent structures are spatiotemporally tracked, resulting in a complex multilayer network. Network motif analysis, i.e., extracting dominant non-random elemental patterns within these networks, is used to identify the most dominant dynamical mechanisms. Both approaches, combined with network motif analysis, are used to answer whether the main dynamical mechanisms of a minimal flow unit (MFU) and a larger unconstrained channel flow, labeled a full channel (FC), at $Re_τ\approx 180$, are equivalent. The first approach tracks traditional coherent structures defined as low- and high-speed streaks, ejections, and sweeps. It is found that the roll-streak pairing, consistent with the current understanding of self-sustaining processes, is the most significant and simplest dynamical mechanism in both flows. However, the MFU has a timescale for this mechanism that is approximately $2.83$ times slower than that of the FC. In the second approach, we use semi-Lagrangian wavepackets and define coherent structures from their energetic streak, roll, and small-scale phase space. This method also shows similar motifs for both the MFU and FC. It indicates that, on average, the most dominant phase-space motifs are similar between the two flows, with the significant events taking place approximately $2.21$ times slower in the MFU than in the FC. This value is more consistent with the implied timescale ratio of only the slow speed streaks taking part in the roll-streak pairing extracted using the first multi-type spatiotemporal approach, which is approximately $2.17$ slower in the MFU than the FC.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑