arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2401.03097cs.LGcs.CYcs.SYeess.SY
收藏

基于公平性感知重加权技术的自适应提升公平分类方法

Adaptive Boosting with Fairness-aware Reweighting Technique for Fair Classification

Tsinghua University(清华大学);Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology(北京信息科学与技术国家研究中心)

Xiaobin Song, Zeyuan Liu, Benben Jiang

AI总结:

提出公平 AdaBoost(FAB)方法,利用公平性感知重加权技术在保持预测性能的同时实现公平分类,并推导了目标损失函数上界,在三个真实数据集上优于现有公平分类方法。

摘要:

基于 AdaBoost 的机器学习方法已广泛应用于医疗、法律和金融等关键应用领域的各类分类问题。然而,数据驱动分类模型的不公平性和歧视问题日益受到关注,这对包括 AdaBoost 在内的经典算法而言是不可避免的。为了实现公平分类,提出了一种新颖的公平 AdaBoost(FAB)方法,它是 AdaBoost 的可解释公平性改进变体。我们主要研究二元分类问题,并关注三个不同指标(即准确率、假阳性率和假阴性率)的公平性。通过对基分类器利用公平性感知重加权技术,所提出的 FAB 方法能够实现公平分类,同时保持 AdaBoost 的优势,且预测性能的牺牲微乎其微。此外,FAB 中引入了一个超参数来体现对公平性-准确率权衡的偏好。为 FAB 理论推导了量化错误率和不公平性的目标损失函数的上界,这为专为 AdaBoost 设计的公平性改进方法提供了严格的理论支持。所提方法的有效性在三个真实世界数据集(即 Adult、COMPAS 和 HSLS)上得到了验证,并针对上述三个公平性指标进行了评估。结果与理论分析一致,并表明:(i)与 AdaBoost 相比,FAB 以较小的准确率代价显著提升了分类公平性;(ii)在公平性-准确率权衡方面,FAB 优于包括均等化赔率方法、指数梯度方法和差异化误处理方法在内的最先进公平分类方法。

英文摘要:

Machine learning methods based on AdaBoost have been widely applied to various classification problems across many mission-critical applications including healthcare, law and finance. However, there is a growing concern about the unfairness and discrimination of data-driven classification models, which is inevitable for classical algorithms including AdaBoost. In order to achieve fair classification, a novel fair AdaBoost (FAB) approach is proposed that is an interpretable fairness-improving variant of AdaBoost. We mainly investigate binary classification problems and focus on the fairness of three different indicators (i.e., accuracy, false positive rate and false negative rate). By utilizing a fairness-aware reweighting technique for base classifiers, the proposed FAB approach can achieve fair classification while maintaining the advantage of AdaBoost with negligible sacrifice of predictive performance. In addition, a hyperparameter is introduced in FAB to show preferences for the fairness-accuracy trade-off. An upper bound for the target loss function that quantifies error rate and unfairness is theoretically derived for FAB, which provides a strict theoretical support for the fairness-improving methods designed for AdaBoost. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated on three real-world datasets (i.e., Adult, COMPAS and HSLS) with respect to the three fairness indicators. The results are accordant with theoretic analyses, and show that (i) FAB significantly improves classification fairness at a small cost of accuracy compared with AdaBoost; and (ii) FAB outperforms state-of-the-art fair classification methods including equalized odds method, exponentiated gradient method, and disparate mistreatment method in terms of the fairness-accuracy trade-off.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑