arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2312.09354cs.CY
收藏

老年人在社交媒体上的不实信息接触经历

Older Adults' Experiences with Misinformation on Social Media

Filipo Sharevski, Jennifer Vander Loop

AI总结:

本研究结合定性调查与深度访谈,从投票意向视角探究美国老年人对社交媒体不实信息的认知与辨别情况,发现不同党派意向群体的认知、担忧存在显著差异。

摘要:

老年人常会在社交媒体上接触到不实信息,但目前人们对其相关经历的了解十分有限。本研究结合定性调查(样本量n=119)与深度访谈(样本量n=21),探究美国老年人如何认知、辨别社交媒体不实信息并将其置于具体语境中理解。由于过往社交媒体上的不实信息多以影响投票结果为传播导向,本研究特意从投票意向视角展开研究。研究发现,62%有意投票给民主党的参与者认为不实信息传播背后存在操纵性政治目的,而有意投票给共和党的参与者中仅5%认为不实信息具有表达政治异见的目的。无论投票意向如何,多数参与者都依赖信源启发式判断结合事实核查的方式,辨别社交媒体上的真相与不实信息。所有参与者对不实信息的最大担忧在于,它愈发导致人们受个人价值观和情绪影响产生偏见性推理,而非基于客观证据进行推理。74%有意投票给民主党的参与者担忧不实信息未来会加剧极端主义,而有意投票给共和党、尚未决定投票意向或计划弃权(不执行)的参与者则担忧不实信息会进一步侵蚀民众对民主制度的信任,尤其是在公共卫生以及自由公正选举的语境下。访谈过程中我们发现,63%有意投票给共和党的参与者完全知晓并承认,共和党或保守派声音时常传播不实信息,即便这些声音与他们自身的政治意识形态高度契合。

英文摘要:

Older adults habitually encounter misinformation on social media, but there is little knowledge about their experiences with it. In this study, we combined a qualitative survey (n=119) with in-depth interviews (n=21) to investigate how older adults in America conceptualize, discern, and contextualize social media misinformation. As misinformation on social media in the past was driven towards influencing voting outcomes, we were particularly interested to approach our study from a voting intention perspective. We found that 62% of the participants intending to vote Democrat saw a manipulative political purpose behind the spread of misinformation while only 5% of those intending to vote Republican believed misinformation has a political dissent purpose. Regardless of the voting intentions, most participants relied on source heuristics combined with fact-checking to discern truth from misinformation on social media. The biggest concern about the misinformation, among all the participants, was that it increasingly leads to biased reasoning influenced by personal values and feelings instead of reasoning based on objective evidence. The participants intending to vote Democrat were in 74% of the cases concerned that misinformation will cause escalation of extremism in the future, while those intending to vote Republican, were undecided, or planned to abstain were concerned that misinformation will further erode the trust in democratic institutions, specifically in the context of public health and free and fair elections. During our interviews, we found that 63% of the participants who intended to vote Republican, were fully aware and acknowledged that Republican or conservative voices often time speak misinformation, even though they are closely aligned to their political ideology.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑