arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2311.08290cs.LG

在线策略策略梯度强化学习无需在线采样

On-Policy Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning Without On-Policy Sampling

Nicholas E. Corrado, Josiah P. Hanna

AI总结:

本文提出PROPS方法,通过自适应离线采样减少在线策略梯度强化学习中的采样误差,提高数据效率。

摘要:

在线强化学习(RL)算法通常被描述为使用由智能体当前策略收集的i.i.d.轨迹进行策略更新的算法。然而,在观察到有限数量的轨迹后,这种在线采样可能会产生无法匹配预期在线采样数据分布的数据。这种采样误差会导致高方差的梯度估计,从而产生数据效率低的在线学习。最近在策略评估设置中的工作表明,非i.i.d.的离线采样可以产生比在线采样产生的数据在预期在线分布方面具有更低采样误差的数据(Zhong等人,2022)。受这一观察的启发,我们引入了一种自适应的离线采样方法,以减少在线策略梯度RL训练过程中的采样误差。我们的方法,Proximal Robust On-Policy Sampling(PROPS),通过收集具有增加概率采样当前策略下采样不足的动作的行为策略,来减少采样误差。我们实证地在连续动作MuJoCo基准任务以及离散动作任务上评估PROPS,并证明了(1)PROPS在整个训练过程中减少采样误差,(2)提高在线策略梯度算法的数据效率。

英文摘要:

On-policy reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are typically characterized as algorithms that perform policy updates using i.i.d. trajectories collected by the agent's current policy. However, after observing only a finite number of trajectories, such on-policy sampling may produce data that fails to match the expected on-policy data distribution. This sampling error leads to high-variance gradient estimates that yield data-inefficient on-policy learning. Recent work in the policy evaluation setting has shown that non-i.i.d., off-policy sampling can produce data with lower sampling error w.r.t. the expected on-policy distribution than on-policy sampling can produce (Zhong et. al, 2022). Motivated by this observation, we introduce an adaptive, off-policy sampling method to reduce sampling error during on-policy policy gradient RL training. Our method, Proximal Robust On-Policy Sampling (PROPS), reduces sampling error by collecting data with a behavior policy that increases the probability of sampling actions that are under-sampled w.r.t. the current policy. We empirically evaluate PROPS on continuous-action MuJoCo benchmark tasks as well as discrete-action tasks and demonstrate that (1) PROPS decreases sampling error throughout training and (2) increases the data efficiency of on-policy policy gradient algorithms.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑