arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2311.08047astro-ph.CO
收藏

利用DES Y1和Planck数据约束重子物理——结合星系成团、弱引力透镜和CMB透镜

Constraining Baryonic Physics with DES Y1 and Planck data -- Combining Galaxy Clustering, Weak Lensing, and CMB Lensing

Jiachuan Xu, Tim Eifler, Vivian Miranda, Xiao Fang, Evan Saraivanov, Elisabeth Krause, Hung-Jin Huang, Karim Benabed, Kunhao Zhong

AI总结:

联合DES Y1和Planck数据,通过6×2分析(弱透镜、星系成团、CMB透镜及其互相关)约束宇宙学参数和重子反馈,测得S8=0.799±0.016,并利用主成分振幅有效模拟重子效应。

摘要:

我们通过联合分析弱引力透镜、星系成团、宇宙微波背景(CMB)透镜及其互相关(即所谓的6×2),利用暗能量巡天(DES)Y1数据和普朗克卫星任务数据,约束宇宙学参数和重子反馈情景。我们6×2分析流程的显著特点包括:将CMB透镜互相关测量扩展到围绕DES Y1覆盖区域的条带(配对数量增加约25%),并发展了能够处理不同覆盖区域和6×2分析中所有交叉项的解析协方差能力。我们还测量了DES Y1宇宙切变两点相关函数(2PCF)低至0.25角分,但发现由于形状噪声,低于2.5角分并不会增加宇宙学信息。我们通过从一组流体动力学模拟中导出的主成分(PCs)的振幅来模拟重子物理不确定性。鉴于我们的统计不确定性,仅改变第一个PC振幅Q1就足以模拟小尺度宇宙切变2PCF。对于DES Y1+Planck 6×2,我们得到S8=0.799±0.016,与DES Y3+SPT/Planck的5×2结果S8=0.773±0.016相当。结合我们信息量最大的宇宙学先验——重子声学振荡(BAO)、大爆炸核合成(BBN)、Ia型超新星(SNe Ia)和Planck 2018 EE+lowE,我们测得S8=0.817±0.011。关于重子物理约束,我们的6×2分析得到Q1=2.8±1.8。结合上述先验,约束改善为Q1=3.5±1.3。作为比较,本文考虑的最强反馈情景,即cosmo-OWLS AGN(ΔT_heat=10^8.7 K),对应Q1=5.84。

英文摘要:

We constrain cosmology and baryonic feedback scenarios with a joint analysis of weak lensing, galaxy clustering, cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing, and their cross-correlations (so-called 6$\times$2) using data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y1 and the Planck satellite mission. Noteworthy features of our 6$\times$2 pipeline are: We extend CMB lensing cross-correlation measurements to a band surrounding the DES Y1 footprint (a $\sim 25\%$ gain in pairs), and we develop analytic covariance capabilities that account for different footprints and all cross-terms in the 6$\times$2 analysis. We also measure the DES Y1 cosmic shear two-point correlation function (2PCF) down to $0.^\prime 25$, but find that going below $2.^\prime 5$ does not increase cosmological information due to shape noise. We model baryonic physics uncertainties via the amplitude of Principal Components (PCs) derived from a set of hydro-simulations. Given our statistical uncertainties, varying the first PC amplitude $Q_1$ is sufficient to model small-scale cosmic shear 2PCF. For DES Y1+Planck 6$\times$2 we find $S_8=0.799\pm0.016$, comparable to the 5$\times$2 result of DES Y3+SPT/Planck $S_8=0.773\pm0.016$. Combined with our most informative cosmology priors -- baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO), big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), and Planck 2018 EE+lowE, we measure $S_8=0.817\pm 0.011$. Regarding baryonic physics constraints, our 6$\times$2 analysis finds $Q_1=2.8\pm1.8$. Combined with the aforementioned priors, it improves the constraint to $Q_1=3.5\pm1.3$. For comparison, the strongest feedback scenario considered in this paper, the cosmo-OWLS AGN ($ΔT_\mathrm{heat}=10^{8.7}$ K), corresponds to $Q_1=5.84$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑