arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2310.13093eess.IV

通用视频编码标准的视频质量评估与编码复杂度

Video Quality Assessment and Coding Complexity of the Versatile Video Coding Standard

Thomas Amestoy, Naty Sidaty, Wassim Hamidouche, Pierrick Philippe, Daniel Menard

AI总结:

本文全面分析了VVC标准相比HEVC的编码性能与复杂度,发现VVC在主客观质量上可节省31%-40%比特率,但解码复杂度增加1.5倍,编码复杂度至少增加8倍。

摘要:

近年来,IPTV、虚拟现实(VR,360度)和点云视频等多媒体应用与格式的普及,给视频压缩研究界带来了新的挑战。同时,用户对更高分辨率和更好视觉质量的需求也在不断增长。为了进一步提高编码效率,2020年7月推出了一项新的视频编码标准,即通用视频编码(VVC)。本文对最新的VVC标准与其前身高效视频编码(HEVC)的编码性能和复杂度进行了全面分析。研究采用了多种测试序列,涵盖高清(HD)和超高清(UHD)分辨率,并跨越广泛的比特率范围。这些序列使用HEVC(HM)和VVC(VTM)的参考软件编码器进行编码。结果一致表明,VVC优于HEVC,在主观质量指标上实现了高达40%的比特率节省,特别是在现实的比特率和质量水平下。包括PSNR、SSIM和VMAF在内的客观质量指标支持了这些发现,显示根据视频内容、空间分辨率和所选的质量指标,比特率节省在31%到40%之间。然而,编码效率的这些改进是以计算复杂度显著增加为代价的。平均而言,我们的结果表明VVC解码过程的复杂度增加了1.5倍,而编码过程的复杂度比HEVC参考编码器至少增加了八倍。我们对两个标准的同时分析揭示了它们之间的主要演进差异,并突出了导致观察到的复杂度增加的具体阶段。

英文摘要:

In recent years, the proliferation of multimedia applications and formats, such as IPTV, Virtual Reality (VR, 360-degree), and point cloud videos, has presented new challenges to the video compression research community. Simultaneously, there has been a growing demand from users for higher resolutions and improved visual quality. To further enhance coding efficiency, a new video coding standard, Versatile Video Coding (VVC), was introduced in July 2020. This paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of coding performance and complexity for the latest VVC standard in comparison to its predecessor, High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). The study employs a diverse set of test sequences, covering both High Definition (HD) and Ultra High Definition (UHD) resolutions, and spans a wide range of bit-rates. These sequences are encoded using the reference software encoders of HEVC (HM) and VVC (VTM). The results consistently demonstrate that VVC outperforms HEVC, achieving bit-rate savings of up to 40% on the subjective quality scale, particularly at realistic bit-rates and quality levels. Objective quality metrics, including PSNR, SSIM, and VMAF, support these findings, revealing bit-rate savings ranging from 31% to 40%, depending on the video content, spatial resolution, and the selected quality metric. However, these improvements in coding efficiency come at the cost of significantly increased computational complexity. On average, our results indicate that the VVC decoding process is 1.5 times more complex, while the encoding process becomes at least eight times more complex than that of the HEVC reference encoder. Our simultaneous profiling of the two standards sheds light on the primary evolutionary differences between them and highlights the specific stages responsible for the observed increase in complexity.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑