arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2607.22783eess.IVcs.CV

JPEG AIC2026:用于图像编码细粒度评估的大规模数据集

JPEG AIC2026: A large-scale dataset for fine-grained assessment of image coding

Mohsen Jenadeleh, Jon Sneyers, João Ascenso, Thomas Richter, Alexander Karabutov, Panqi Jia, Elena Alshina, Osamu Watanabe, António Pinheiro, Touradj Ebrahimi, Dietmar Saupe

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

为满足图像编码质量细粒度评估需求,介绍AIC2026数据集。从众多候选图像中选70张源图像,经多种方式筛选。涵盖多种编解码器及配置产生的伪像,对源图像编码后获大量失真图像,用多种IQA方法分析发现当前方法在细粒度质量评估上分歧大。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

传统和基于学习的图像编码的最新进展,增加了对支持压缩图像质量细粒度评估的基准数据集的需求。本文介绍了图像编码评估2026(AIC2026),这是一个用于高保真图像压缩的大规模数据集,包含70张源图像,这些图像是从2787个候选图像中通过语义聚类、客观图像质量评估(IQA)方法之间的度量分歧以及人工检查和改进选择出来的。该数据集涵盖了由八种传统编解码器和四种基于学习的编解码器在17种编码配置下产生的广泛压缩伪像。每个源图像使用七种编解码器进行编码。对于每个源 - 编解码器对,使用ColorVideoVDP(CVVDP)度量估计失真,在20个感知间隔的失真水平上提供解码图像,产生9618个失真图像。通过广泛的客观分析发现,当前IQA方法在细粒度质量差异上存在很大分歧,特别是对于基于学习的编解码器引入的伪像。完整数据集可公开获取。

英文摘要

Recent advances in conventional and learning-based image coding have increased the demand for benchmark datasets that support fine-grained assessment of compressed image quality, particularly for learning-based image compression methods. This paper introduces Assessment of Image Coding 2026 (AIC2026), a large-scale dataset for high-fidelity image compression containing 70 source images selected from 2,787 candidates using semantic clustering, inter-metric disagreement among objective image quality assessment (IQA) methods, and manual inspection and refinement. The dataset covers a wide range of compression artifacts produced by eight conventional and four learning-based codecs across 17 coding configurations. Each source image is encoded using seven codecs. For each source-codec pair, decoded images are provided at 20 perceptually spaced distortion levels, corresponding approximately to 0.2-4.0 just-noticeable difference (JND) units using the ColorVideoVDP (CVVDP) metric for distortion estimation, yielding 9,618 distorted images. This fine-grained sampling enables analysis of rate-distortion behavior and objective metric evaluation for subtle quality differences across a wide range of compression artifacts. We report an extensive objective analysis using 24 conventional and 12 learning-based IQA methods. The results show substantial disagreement among current IQA methods for fine-grained quality differences, particularly for artifacts introduced by learning-based codecs. The complete dataset is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.18419/DARUS-6156.

发表机构

  • University of Konstanz(康斯坦茨大学)
  • Cloudinary(Cloudinary公司)
  • IST-IT(IST-IT机构)
  • Fraunhofer IIS(弗劳恩霍夫应用固体物理研究所)
  • Huawei(华为公司)
  • Takushoku University(拓殖大学)
  • IT-UBI(IT-UBI机构)
  • EPFL(洛桑联邦理工学院)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

↑