arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2310.02462cs.ROcs.AIcs.HC
收藏

结合计划识别与语言反馈的人类意图改进推理

Improved Inference of Human Intent by Combining Plan Recognition and Language Feedback

Brown University(布朗大学);Arizona State University(亚利桑那州立大学)

Ifrah Idrees, Tian Yun, Naveen Sharma, Yunxin Deng, Nakul Gopalan, George Konidaris, Stefanie Tellex

AI总结:

本文提出D4GR框架,通过语言澄清问题和分层任务模型修正机器人对人类计划与目标的信念,在模拟及真实厨房场景中以更少提问提升含噪条件下的识别准确率。

摘要:

对话式辅助机器人可以帮助人们,尤其是认知障碍者,完成做饭、锻炼或操作机器等各种任务。然而,为了与人有效互动,机器人必须从对人类动作的含噪观测中识别人类计划和目标,即使用户采取次优行动也是如此。以往将计划与目标识别(PGR)视为规划问题的研究使用分层任务网络(HTN)来对行动者/人类建模。但是,这些技术存在不足,因为它们没有通过语言等自然交互方式促使用户参与。此外,它们也没有机制让用户,尤其是认知障碍者,知道自己偏离了原始计划,或知道自己为实现目标采取了任何次优行动。我们提出了一种用于部分可观测领域中计划与目标识别的新颖框架——Dialogue for Goal Recognition(D4GR),使机器人能够通过提出关于含噪传感器数据和次优人类行动的澄清问题,来修正其对人类进展的信念。我们在厨房和积木世界两个模拟领域中评估了D4GR的性能。通过在分层任务模型中结合语言反馈和世界状态信息,我们表明,在最高传感器噪声条件下,D4GR框架在两个领域中的目标准确率均比HTN高1%。在计划准确率方面,与HTN相比,D4GR在厨房领域高4%,在积木领域高2%。ALWAYS-ASK预言机在目标识别上比我们的策略高3%,在计划识别上高7%。D4GR通过比预言机基线少问68%的问题实现了上述性能。我们还展示了厨房领域中的真实机器人场景,验证了D4GR在现实环境中改进的计划与目标识别能力。

英文摘要:

Conversational assistive robots can aid people, especially those with cognitive impairments, to accomplish various tasks such as cooking meals, performing exercises, or operating machines. However, to interact with people effectively, robots must recognize human plans and goals from noisy observations of human actions, even when the user acts sub-optimally. Previous works on Plan and Goal Recognition (PGR) as planning have used hierarchical task networks (HTN) to model the actor/human. However, these techniques are insufficient as they do not have user engagement via natural modes of interaction such as language. Moreover, they have no mechanisms to let users, especially those with cognitive impairments, know of a deviation from their original plan or about any sub-optimal actions taken towards their goal. We propose a novel framework for plan and goal recognition in partially observable domains -- Dialogue for Goal Recognition (D4GR) enabling a robot to rectify its belief in human progress by asking clarification questions about noisy sensor data and sub-optimal human actions. We evaluate the performance of D4GR over two simulated domains -- kitchen and blocks domain. With language feedback and the world state information in a hierarchical task model, we show that D4GR framework for the highest sensor noise performs 1% better than HTN in goal accuracy in both domains. For plan accuracy, D4GR outperforms by 4% in the kitchen domain and 2% in the blocks domain in comparison to HTN. The ALWAYS-ASK oracle outperforms our policy by 3% in goal recognition and 7%in plan recognition. D4GR does so by asking 68% fewer questions than an oracle baseline. We also demonstrate a real-world robot scenario in the kitchen domain, validating the improved plan and goal recognition of D4GR in a realistic setting.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑