arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2309.08533cs.CVcs.HC

通过聚类神经网络输出实现人机交互的自动化皮肤镜模式发现

Automated dermatoscopic pattern discovery by clustering neural network output for human-computer interaction

University of the Balearic Islands(巴利阿里群岛大学);Medical University of Vienna(维也纳医科大学)

Lidia Talavera-Martinez, Philipp Tschandl

AI总结:

本研究针对大规模医学图像手动审查困难的问题,提出利用神经网络特征提取结合 k-means 聚类与紧凑度指标,从 HAM10000 数据集中自动提取出人类可解释且诊断相关的皮肤镜视觉模式。

摘要:

背景:随着可用医学图像数据集规模不断增加,临床医生手动审查内容以提取知识变得不可行。本研究旨在创建一种自动聚类方法,以实现人类可解释的模式发现。方法:将来自公开 HAM10000 数据集(包含7种常见色素性皮损诊断)的图像切分为29420个图块,并使用神经网络提取的图像特征通过 k-means 进行聚类。每种诊断的最终聚类数量通过肘部法或平衡皮损内方差与聚类数量的紧凑度指标来选择。比较了两种方法产生的非信息性聚类(定义为包含少于六个图像图块的聚类)的数量。结果:应用 k-means 时,最优肘部截断值导致每种诊断平均产生24.7(95% CI: 16.4-33)个聚类,其中包含14.9%(95% CI: 0.8-29.0)的非信息性聚类。由紧凑度指标估计的最优截断值导致聚类数量显著减少(13.4;95% CI: 11.8-15.1;p=0.03),且非信息性聚类更少(7.5%;95% CI: 0-19.5;p=0.017)。紧凑度指标产生的大多数聚类(93.6%)可被手动映射到先前描述的皮肤镜诊断模式。结论:自动约束无监督聚类能够从大型图像数据集中自动提取诊断相关且人类可解释的视觉模式聚类。

英文摘要:

Background: As available medical image datasets increase in size, it becomes infeasible for clinicians to review content manually for knowledge extraction. The objective of this study was to create an automated clustering resulting in human-interpretable pattern discovery. Methods: Images from the public HAM10000 dataset, including 7 common pigmented skin lesion diagnoses, were tiled into 29420 tiles and clustered via k-means using neural network-extracted image features. The final number of clusters per diagnosis was chosen by either the elbow method or a compactness metric balancing intra-lesion variance and cluster numbers. The amount of resulting non-informative clusters, defined as those containing less than six image tiles, was compared between the two methods. Results: Applying k-means, the optimal elbow cutoff resulted in a mean of 24.7 (95%-CI: 16.4-33) clusters for every included diagnosis, including 14.9% (95% CI: 0.8-29.0) non-informative clusters. The optimal cutoff, as estimated by the compactness metric, resulted in significantly fewer clusters (13.4; 95%-CI 11.8-15.1; p=0.03) and less non-informative ones (7.5%; 95% CI: 0-19.5; p=0.017). The majority of clusters (93.6%) from the compactness metric could be manually mapped to previously described dermatoscopic diagnostic patterns. Conclusions: Automatically constraining unsupervised clustering can produce an automated extraction of diagnostically relevant and human-interpretable clusters of visual patterns from a large image dataset.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑