arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1810.09487cs.CVcs.HCcs.LG
收藏

基于深度分类特征的皮肤镜图像检索的诊断准确率

Diagnostic Accuracy of Content Based Dermatoscopic Image Retrieval with Deep Classification Features

Philipp Tschandl, Giuseppe Argenziano, Majid Razmara, Jordan Yap

摘要:

背景:通过神经网络对医学图像进行自动分类可以达到很高的准确率,但缺乏可解释性。目的:比较使用基于内容的图像检索(CBIR)检索视觉上相似的皮肤镜图像(带有相应的疾病标签)与神经网络预测的诊断准确性。研究方法:一个神经网络进行训练,预测疾病类别的皮肤镜图像从三个回顾性收集的图像数据集,分别包含888,2750和16691图像。诊断预测是基于视觉相似图像中最常见的诊断,或者基于网络输出的softmax的前1类预测。结果测量是预测恶性病变的ROC曲线下面积(AUC),多类准确度和平均精度(mAP),在相应数据集的未见过的测试图像上测量。结果如下:在所有三个数据集中,来自CBIR的皮肤癌预测(评估16个最相似的图像)显示出与softmax预测相似的AUC值(分别为0.842,0.806和0.852与0.830,0.810和0.847;所有p值>0.99)。同样,CBIR的多类准确性与softmax预测相当。当使用CBIR时,与softmax预测相比,训练用于检测仅3个类的网络在具有8个类的数据集上表现更好(mAP分别为0.184 vs. 0.368和0.198 vs. 0.403)。结论:基于神经网络的特征呈现视觉上相似的图像显示出与卷积神经网络的softmax基于概率的诊断相当的准确性。CBIR可能比softmax分类器更有助于提高临床医生在常规临床环境中的诊断准确性。

英文摘要:

Background: Automated classification of medical images through neural networks can reach high accuracy rates but lack interpretability. Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy obtained by using content based image retrieval (CBIR) to retrieve visually similar dermatoscopic images with corresponding disease labels against predictions made by a neural network. Methods: A neural network was trained to predict disease classes on dermatoscopic images from three retrospectively collected image datasets containing 888, 2750 and 16691 images respectively. Diagnosis predictions were made based on the most commonly occurring diagnosis in visually similar images, or based on the top-1 class prediction of the softmax output from the network. Outcome measures were area under the ROC curve for predicting a malignant lesion (AUC), multiclass-accuracy and mean average precision (mAP), measured on unseen test images of the corresponding dataset. Results: In all three datasets the skin cancer predictions from CBIR (evaluating the 16 most similar images) showed AUC values similar to softmax predictions (0.842, 0.806 and 0.852 versus 0.830, 0.810 and 0.847 respectively; p-value>0.99 for all). Similarly, the multiclass-accuracy of CBIR was comparable to softmax predictions. Networks trained for detecting only 3 classes performed better on a dataset with 8 classes when using CBIR as compared to softmax predictions (mAP 0.184 vs. 0.368 and 0.198 vs. 0.403 respectively). Conclusions: Presenting visually similar images based on features from a neural network shows comparable accuracy to the softmax probability-based diagnoses of convolutional neural networks. CBIR may be more helpful than a softmax classifier in improving diagnostic accuracy of clinicians in a routine clinical setting.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑