arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2306.03490cs.DMcs.CG
收藏

锚定交叉数与几乎平面图的交叉数的复杂性

Complexity of Anchored Crossing Number and Crossing Number of Almost Planar Graphs

Petr Hliněný

AI总结:

本文证明仅需三个高度数顶点或三个锚点即可使几乎平面图交叉数和锚定交叉数问题保持 NP 难,从而显著加强并优化了已有难解性结果。

摘要:

本文研究计算几乎平面图的精确交叉数问题,以及与之密切相关的计算一对平面图的精确锚定交叉数问题。[Cabello 和 Mohar, 2013] 已证明这两个问题都是 NP 难的;不过他们为了证明该结果,需要(在第一个问题中)使用数量无界的高度数顶点,或(在第二个问题中)使用数量无界的锚点。令人有些意外的是,正如我们在本文中所证明的,仅需三个度数大于 3 的顶点,或仅需三个锚点,就足以保持这些问题的 NP 难性。这一新结果也改进了 [Hliněný 和 Salazar, 2015] 关于曲面上联合交叉数难解性的先前结果。我们的结果在锚定情形下是最优的,因为每张平面图各有两个锚点时,一对平面图的锚定交叉数是平凡的;而在几乎平面图情形下,该结果也接近最优,因为对于最大度为 3 的几乎平面图,其交叉数可以高效计算 [Riskin 1996, Cabello 和 Mohar 2011]。

英文摘要:

In this paper we deal with the problem of computing the exact crossing number of almost planar graphs and the closely related problem of computing the exact anchored crossing number of a pair of planar graphs. It was shown by [Cabello and Mohar, 2013] that both problems are NP-hard; although they required an unbounded number of high-degree vertices (in the first problem) or an unbounded number of anchors (in the second problem) to prove their result. Somehow surprisingly, only three vertices of degree greater than 3, or only three anchors, are sufficient to maintain hardness of these problems, as we prove here. The new result also improves the previous result on hardness of joint crossing number on surfaces by [Hliněný and Salazar, 2015]. Our result is best possible in the anchored case since the anchored crossing number of a pair of planar graphs with two anchors each is trivial, and close to being best possible in the almost planar case since the crossing number is efficiently computable for almost planar graphs of maximum degree 3 [Riskin 1996, Cabello and Mohar 2011].

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑