arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2305.04785astro-ph.IM
收藏

利用星系团研究X射线仪器

Studying X-ray instruments with galaxy clusters

J. Nevalainen, S. Molendi

AI总结:

本文利用星系团样本量化XMM-Newton EPIC仪器间有效面积交叉校准偏差,发现MOS/pn存在系统性偏差,并提出将散布传播至拟合参数以稳健处理校准不确定性。

摘要:

我们采用科学方法处理XMM-Newton EPIC仪器的有效面积交叉校准问题。利用XMM-Newton EPIC观测到的星系团样本,我们量化了2021年11月公共校准数据库中EPIC仪器之间在0.5-6.1 keV能带的有效面积交叉校准偏差。我们投入了大量精力将交叉校准偏差的系统不确定性控制在1%以下。统计不确定性与之相似,因此我们能够可靠地测量1%水平上的效应。在0.5-6.1 keV能带中,MOS与pn之间的有效面积交叉校准存在显著偏差。MOS/pn偏差具有系统性,表明MOS(pn)的有效面积可能被校准得过低(高),平均偏差约3-27%,具体取决于仪器和能带。MOS2和pn有效面积能量依赖性(即形状)的极佳一致性表明,在0.5-4.5 keV能带内它们的校准误差在约1%以内。与独立点源数据集(3XMM)的比较证实了这一点。星系团样本表明,MOS1/pn有效面积形状交叉校准在0.5-4.5 keV能带内存在近似线性偏差,最大约10%。2021年11月XMM-Newton/EPIC仪器在0.5-4.5 keV能带的有效面积交叉校准状态相对良好。然而,星系团之间的偏差均方根散布相对于中位偏差本身是显著的。因此,在对XMM-Newton/EPIC数据进行科学分析时,统计上稳健的交叉校准不确定性实现应包括将散布传播到最佳拟合参数,而不是简单地对有效面积进行平均偏差校正。

英文摘要:

We applied a scientific approach to the problem of the effective area cross-calibration of the XMM-Newton EPIC instruments. Using a sample of galaxy clusters observed with the XMM-Newton EPIC, we quantified the effective area cross-calibration bias between the EPIC instruments as implemented in the public calibration data base on November 2021 in the 0.5-6.1 keV energy band. We invested significant efforts in controlling and minimising the systematic uncertainties of the cross-calibration bias below 1%. The statistical uncertainties are similar and thus we can reliably measure effects at 1% level. The effective area cross-calibration in the 0.5-6.1 keV band between MOS and pn is biased at a substantial level. The MOS/pn bias is systematic suggesting that MOS (pn) effective area may be calibrated too low (high), by $\sim$3-27% on average depending on the instrument and energy band. The excellent agreement of the energy dependencies (i.e. shapes) of the effective area of MOS2 and pn suggest that they are correctly calibrated within $\sim$1% in the 0.5-4.5 keV band. Comparison with an independent data set of point sources (3XMM) confirms this. The cluster sample indicates that the MOS1/pn effective area shape cross-calibration has an approximately linear bias amounting to $\sim$10% in maximum in the 0.5-4.5 keV band. The effective area cross-calibration of XMM-Newton/EPIC instruments on November 2021 in the 0.5-4.5 keV band is in a relatively good shape. However, the cluster-to-cluster rms scatter of the bias is substantial compared to the median bias itself. Thus, a statistically robust implementation of the cross-calibration uncertainties to a scientific analysis of XMM-Newton/EPIC data should include the propagation of the scatter to the best-fit parameters, instead of a simple average bias correction of the effective area.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑