arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2304.04745cs.CV

使用 Diffusion Models 的模糊医学图像分割

Ambiguous Medical Image Segmentation using Diffusion Models

Johns Hopkins University(约翰斯·霍普金斯大学);University of British Columbia(不列颠哥伦比亚大学)

Aimon Rahman, Jeya Maria Jose Valanarasu, Ilker Hacihaliloglu, Vishal M Patel

AI总结:

提出一种基于单一 diffusion model 的医学图像分割方法,通过学习群体见解分布生成多个合理分割掩码,在 CT、超声和 MRI 上验证了其优于现有模糊分割网络的准确性与多样性。

摘要:

在临床任务中,一组专家的集体见解总是被证明优于个人的最佳诊断。对于医学图像分割任务,现有的基于 AI 的替代方案研究更多地集中在开发能够模仿最佳个人的模型,而不是利用专家群体的力量。在本文中,我们引入了一种基于单一 diffusion model 的方法,该方法通过学习群体见解的分布来产生多个合理的输出。我们提出的模型利用 diffusion 固有的随机采样过程,仅需最少的额外学习即可生成分割掩码的分布。我们在三种不同的医学图像模态——CT、超声和 MRI 上证明,我们的模型能够产生多种可能的变体,同时捕捉它们出现的频率。综合结果表明,我们提出的方法在准确性方面优于现有最先进的模糊分割网络,同时保留了自然发生的变异。我们还提出了一种新的指标来评估分割预测的多样性以及准确性,该指标符合集体见解的临床实践兴趣。

英文摘要:

Collective insights from a group of experts have always proven to outperform an individual's best diagnostic for clinical tasks. For the task of medical image segmentation, existing research on AI-based alternatives focuses more on developing models that can imitate the best individual rather than harnessing the power of expert groups. In this paper, we introduce a single diffusion model-based approach that produces multiple plausible outputs by learning a distribution over group insights. Our proposed model generates a distribution of segmentation masks by leveraging the inherent stochastic sampling process of diffusion using only minimal additional learning. We demonstrate on three different medical image modalities- CT, ultrasound, and MRI that our model is capable of producing several possible variants while capturing the frequencies of their occurrences. Comprehensive results show that our proposed approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art ambiguous segmentation networks in terms of accuracy while preserving naturally occurring variation. We also propose a new metric to evaluate the diversity as well as the accuracy of segmentation predictions that aligns with the interest of clinical practice of collective insights.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑