arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2304.00568astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA
收藏

星际天体

Interstellar Objects

Darryl Z. Seligman, Amaya Moro-Martín

AI总结:

本文回顾了2017年以来发现的两个星际天体1I/`Oumuamua和2I/Borisov的观测特征与起源假设,指出它们揭示了银河系中存在大量类似天体,未来观测将为行星形成过程提供新见解。

摘要:

自2017年以来,在内太阳系中发现了两个宏观星际天体,两者的性质截然不同。第一个星际天体1I/`Oumuamua在距离地球约63个月地距离处掠过,表现出小行星特征,缺乏可检测水平的气体或尘埃散失,然而却呈现出非引力加速度。1I/`Oumuamua的短暂造访留下了关于其起源的未解之谜,这引发了许多理论假设,包括一颗缺乏尘埃彗发的冰冷彗星、一颗因潮汐撕裂而形成的行星或微行星的细长碎片,以及一个超多孔的分形聚集体。第二个星际天体2I/Borisov在整体物理性质上与1I/`Oumuamua不同,并显示出明确的彗尾。我们回顾了这些天体的发现、随后的观测与特征分析,以及关于其起源的理论假设。我们在太阳系活动小行星和彗星的背景下描述了1I/`Oumuamua和2I/Borisov。这两个天体的发现意味着银河系范围内存在约10^26个类似天体。即将到来的天文台应该会探测到更多星际微行星,这可能为行星形成过程在银河系中的差异提供新见解。

英文摘要:

Since 2017, two macroscopic interstellar objects have been discovered in the inner Solar System, both of which are distinct in nature. The first interstellar object, 1I/`Oumuamua, passed within $\sim63$ lunar distances of the Earth, appeared asteroidal lacking detectable levels of gas or dust loss, yet exhibited a nongravitational acceleration. 1I/`Oumuamua's brief visit left open questions regarding its provenance which has given rise to many theoretical hypotheses, including an icy comet lacking a dust coma, an elongated fragment of a planet or planetesimal that was tidally disrupted, and an ultra-porous fractal aggregate. The second interstellar object, 2I/Borisov, was distinct from 1I/`Oumuamua in terms of its bulk physical properties and displayed a definitive cometary tail. We review the discoveries of these objects, the subsequent observations and characterizations, and the theoretical hypotheses regarding their origins. We describe 1I/`Oumuamua and 2I/Borisov in the context of active asteroids and comets in the Solar System. The discovery of these two objects implies a galactic-wide population of $\sim10^{26}$ similar bodies. Forthcoming observatories should detect many more interstellar planetesimals which may offer new insights into how planetary formation processes vary throughout the Galaxy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑