arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.09031math.LOcs.LOmath.CT
收藏

范畴证明论语义学

Categorical Proof-Theoretic Semantics

David Pym, Eike Ritter, Edmund Robinson

AI总结:

本研究将Sandqvist的直觉主义命题逻辑基扩展语义与预层范畴证明论关联,从范畴论重构可靠性与完全性论证,证明其构造的自然性,并指出该语义可视为层范畴中的自然析取。

摘要:

在证明论语义学中,模型论有效性被证明论有效性所取代。公式的有效性是从一个给出原子公式有效性的基础出发,利用从证明论规则导出的归纳子句,通过归纳方式定义的。该领域的一个核心目标是证明证明规则的完全性,且无需依赖任何形式模型。对命题直觉主义逻辑(IPL)建立这一结果会引发一些技术与概念层面的问题。我们将Sandqvist提出的直觉主义命题逻辑(完全的)基扩展语义,与预层范畴中的范畴证明论关联起来,从范畴论角度重构了可靠性与完全性的论证,由此证明了Sandqvist所构建体系的自然性。这种自然性涵盖了Sandqvist对析取的处理方式——该处理基于析取的二阶表示或消去规则表示。这些构建不仅体现了有效性,还包含了特定形式的证明对象。我们进一步推进了这一分析,证明从有效性的视角来看,Sandqvist语义也可被视为层范畴中的自然析取。

英文摘要:

In proof-theoretic semantics, model-theoretic validity is replaced by proof-theoretic validity. Validity of formulae is defined inductively from a base giving the validity of atoms using inductive clauses derived from proof-theoretic rules. A key aim is to show completeness of the proof rules without any requirement for formal models. Establishing this for propositional intuitionistic logic (IPL) raises some technical and conceptual issues. We relate Sandqvist's (complete) base-extension semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic to categorical proof theory in presheaves, reconstructing categorically the soundness and completeness arguments, thereby demonstrating the naturality of Sandqvist's constructions. This naturality includes Sandqvist's treatment of disjunction that is based on its second-order or elimination-rule presentation. These constructions embody not just validity, but certain forms of objects of justifications. This analysis is taken a step further by showing that from the perspective of validity, Sandqvist's semantics can also be viewed as the natural disjunction in a category of sheaves.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑