arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.03486astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
收藏

大质量原恒星周围的盘碎裂:两种三维代码的比较

Disk fragmentation around a massive protostar: a comparison of two three-dimensional codes

Raphaël Mignon-Risse, André Oliva, Matthias González, Rolf Kuiper, Benoît Commerçon

AI总结:

本研究使用RAMSES和PLUTO两种3D模拟代码比较了大质量原恒星周围的盘碎裂过程,发现两者在坍缩特性和碎裂过程上具有良好一致性,且数值选择对系统结果的影响比代码选择更为关键。

摘要:

(节略)大多数大质量恒星位于多重系统中。盘碎裂的建模——一种可能导致恒星多重性的机制——依赖于并行的3D模拟代码,这些代码之间的一致性仍有待评估。使用笛卡尔AMR代码RAMSES,我们将中心凝聚的原恒星系统中的盘碎裂,与Oliva & Kuiper (2020)在球坐标网格上使用PLUTO进行的研究进行了比较。考虑了两次RAMSES运行,给出了在定性上截然不同的图像。当允许无限制地创建汇粒子时,气体碎裂会导致一个多重恒星系统,其多重性在触发碎裂时受网格影响,并受数值辅助合并的影响。另一方面,使用一个唯一的、中心固定的汇粒子,形成了一个中心凝聚的系统,类似于PLUTO中报告的情况。RAMSES与PLUTO的比较是在后者的情况下进行的:发现两个代码在首次旋转支撑盘的形成、盘上吸积激波的存在、第一碎裂阶段方面存在一致性。气体碎块形成,其性质在两个代码之间是一致的。作为一个次要差异,碎块动力学导致RAMSES中的盘结构呈次开普勒状态,而在PLUTO中发现其为开普勒状态并达到平静。我们将这种差异归因于RAMSES中中心恒星质量只有一半,这是由于不同的恒星吸积亚网格模型所致。在一个中心凝聚的系统中,RAMSES和PLUTO在许多坍缩特性和碎裂过程方面的一致性是良好的。当采用相似但平滑的初始条件时,发生在最内部区域的碎裂和数值选择(汇粒子的使用、网格)对系统的结果(多重或中心凝聚)具有至关重要的影响——比代码的选择更为关键。

英文摘要:

(Abridged) Most massive stars are located in multiple systems. The modeling of disk fragmentation, a possible mechanism leading to stellar multiplicity, relies on parallel 3D simulation codes whose agreement remains to be evaluated. Using the Cartesian AMR code RAMSES, we compare disk fragmentation in a centrally-condensed protostellar system to the study of Oliva & Kuiper (2020) performed on a grid in spherical coordinates using PLUTO. Two RAMSES runs are considered and give qualitatively distinct pictures. When allowing for unlimited sink particle creation, gas fragmentation leads to a multiple stellar system whose multiplicity is affected by the grid when triggering fragmentation and by numerically-assisted mergers. On the other hand, using a unique, central, fixed sink particle, a centrally-condensed system forms, similar to that reported in PLUTO. The RAMSES-PLUTO comparison is performed with the latter: agreement between the two codes is found regarding the first rotationally-supported disk formation, the presence of an accretion shock onto it, the first fragmentation phase. Gaseous fragments form and their properties are in agreement between the two codes. As a minor difference, fragments dynamics causes the disk structure to be sub-Keplerian in RAMSES whereas it is found to be Keplerian and reaches quiescence in PLUTO. We attribute this discrepancy to the central star being twice less massive in RAMSES because of the different stellar accretion subgrid models. In a centrally-condensed system, the agreement between RAMSES and PLUTO regarding many of the collapse properties and fragmentation process is good. Fragmentation occurring in the innermost region and numerical choices (use of sink particles, grid) have a crucial impact when similar but smooth initial conditions are employed - more crucial than the code's choice - on the system's outcome, multiple or centrally-condensed.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑