arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.03070astro-ph.EP
收藏

行星何时、何地以及有多少最终进入一阶共振?

When, where, and how many planets end up in first-order resonances?

Shuo Huang, Chris Ormel

AI总结:

本文通过概率模型和MCMC方法分析行星周期比分布,发现约15%系外行星处于一阶平均运动共振,并据此约束行星形成时机与盘面密度,验证了I型迁移理论。

摘要:

I型迁移理论已在许多研究中被广泛使用。凌星多行星系统为我们提供了检验观测与理论一致性的机会,尤其是那些拥有处于平均运动共振(MMR)中的行星的系统。这些共振行星对相对于精确通约性所显示的偏移,为我们提供了有关其迁移和偏心率阻尼历史的信息。在此,我们采用一种概率方法,以两个分布——分别适用于共振或非共振行星——来拟合观测到的行星周期比分布。利用马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛(MCMC)方法,我们发现约15%的系外行星处于一阶(j+1:j)MMR中,偏心率与半长轴阻尼之比过高,无法允许过稳定天平动,且结果大体上与I型迁移理论一致。此外,我们的模型发现,一小部分共振行星对是在迁移过程中被俘获进入共振的,这意味着行星形成较晚(气体贫乏)。大多数共振行星对停留在迁移屏障处,表明行星形成较早(气体丰富)。进一步地,在改进二体共振俘获判据后,我们获得了行星被锁定在共振时盘面密度的上限。

英文摘要:

The theory of Type~I migration has been widely used in many studies. Transiting multi-planet systems offer us the opportunity to examine the consistency between observation and theory, especially for those systems harbouring planets in Mean Motion Resonance (MMR). The displacement these resonant pairs show from exact commensurability provides us with information on their migration and eccentricity-damping histories. Here, we adopt a probabilistic approach, characterized by two distributions -- appropriate for either the resonant or non-resonant planets -- to fit the observed planet period ratio distribution. With the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, we find that ${\approx}15\%$ of exoplanets are in first order ($j+1{:}j$) MMRs, the ratio of eccentricity-to-semi-major axis damping is too high to allow overstable librations and that the results are by-and-large consistent with Type-I migration theory. In addition, our modeling finds that a small fraction of resonant pairs is captured into resonance during migration, implying late planet formation (gas-poor). Most of the resonant pairs park themselves at the migration barrier, indicating early planet formation (gas-rich). Furthermore, after improving the criterion on two-body resonant trapping, we obtain an upper limit of the disc surface density at the time the planets are locked in resonance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑