arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2301.07802quant-ph
收藏

对“量子相对性原理”的评论

Comment on 'Quantum principle of relativity'

Ryszard Horodecki

AI总结:

本文评论 Dragan 和 Ekert 提出的量子相对性原理,指出其超光速与亚光速分支在数学上无法统一,因而该原理不完备。

摘要:

Dragan 和 Ekert 在论文(2020《New. J. Phys.》22 033038)中基于伽利略相对性原理提出了“量子相对性原理”(QPR),该原理同时涉及超光速 $G_S$ 和亚光速 $G_s$ 两类观察者家族,并论证当它们被置于同等地位时,“意味着非确定性动力学的出现,以及复概率幅和多重轨迹的出现。”本文在 Heisenberg 对基本物理理论模型的分类框架下讨论 QPR,该分类以自然界的普适常数——普朗克常数 $h$ 和光速 $c$ 所起的作用为依据。我们指出,超光速分支和亚光速分支是可分离的,即不存在数学上自洽的形式体系将两个分支连接起来。这尤其意味着 QPR 是不完备的。

英文摘要:

Dragan and Ekert in the paper (2020 \emph{New. J. Phys.} \textbf{22} 033038) presented 'quantum principle of relativity' (QPR) based on Galilean principle of relativity, which involves both superluminal $G_S$ and subluminal $G_s$ families of observers and argue that then they are considered on the same footing it 'implies the emergence of non-deterministic dynamics, together with complex probability amplitudes and multiple trajectories.'. Here we discuss QPR in the context of Heisenberg's classification of the fundamental physical theoretical models under the role universal constants of nature: Planck's constant $h$ and speed of light $c$. We point out that both the superluminal and subluminal branches are separable in the sense that there is no mathematical coherent formalism that connect both branches. This, in particular, implies that the QPR is incomplete.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑