arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2212.04445math.LO
收藏

类理论与二阶算术中的非紧致性

Non-tightness in class theory and second-order arithmetic

Alfredo Roque Freire, Kameryn J. Williams

AI总结:

本文证明限制Z2和KM的概括公理模式会产生非紧致理论,GB和ACA0及其添加Sigma^1_k-概括的扩张均承认不同的可双解释扩张,表明紧致性以最小方式刻画Z2和KM。

摘要:

一个理论T是紧致的,如果T的不同演绎封闭扩张(在同一语言中)不能被双解释。许多被充分研究的基础理论是紧致的,包括PA [Visser2006]、ZF、Z2和KM [enayat2017]。在本文中,我们将Enayat的研究扩展到后两个理论的子系统。我们证明限制Z2和KM的概括公理模式会产生非紧致的理论。具体来说,我们表明GB和ACA0各自承认不同的可双解释扩张,并且对于添加Sigma^1_k-概括(k <= 1)的它们的扩张也是如此。这些结果提供了证据表明紧致性以最小方式刻画了Z2和KM。

英文摘要:

A theory T is tight if different deductively closed extensions of T (in the same language) cannot be bi-interpretable. Many well-studied foundational theories are tight, including PA [Visser2006], ZF, Z2, and KM [enayat2017]. In this article we extend Enayat's investigations to subsystems of these latter two theories. We prove that restricting the Comprehension schema of Z2 and KM gives non-tight theories. Specifically, we show that GB and ACA0 each admit different bi-interpretable extensions, and the same holds for their extensions by adding Sigma^1_k-Comprehension, for k <= 1. These results provide evidence that tightness characterizes Z2 and KM in a minimal way.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑